Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4314240ybg; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 07:10:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwHHpsilUYVPUhsyrVS6GqTIXr19r8LJij7ZBLpX+jSGdSKuLuabDvNnr7WbiTEa7LNybOz X-Received: by 2002:a50:b558:: with SMTP id z24mr11877029edd.67.1571667010866; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 07:10:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571667010; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pQTPC96salVoZxpg/X8DO/xUe2Pi31eXiIbtz3mtI2ywlyjTq2hJ4iJT9ggDRui/63 ueSBdgUSH1kiz0Go5Jfzz1dq3Ucma4cS8DDDC+Nd/ADmo3vDGMyKK7BSKTG7UmXGqfVu lWVvKIoFv/exTHS5E+IpmPPkjSszEuFcut2/ZVtO9DrAgZkBwANWYAR4M//UkIHqoozx tfoI9nLUyIcXUfXZcwAVRFCT5Y3sS59s1m4Tk2KngVMvKMfOlyTVKGeluOLc/vYj9JzC eQxxfUVzq4gYLRc98DctsCELaCpiRLXKWoVI28s7+MiNa/BtT6WvFpKguNsIMKml88QH t6kg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:organization:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=uPTraEErlo9G8Ocm0+NrhlyYTmyWYxPLhqeXIDy/F/M=; b=c8k/+swAgn3ZjwW66SeCoZKDWzCvvflMROTsrdpgG4wqrISUAXQtJmk5j0wlgC3r1U phzN/FyXH6Gb04LzcNPN40A/KgBm60Zhnw2hlXZb65DyMK/D8P334ub4csj1k+/U1M4G fZUHykSsdL2R6Til33S0Xz4ImNxfL/FEasFKigZUQ5hhJZgo7mwnROCfam9FDvoCJqlz 7GwbsKFLuGppHnPz2Mv1n5WzAetOANb00GhmacdEAjZYBXhYS3Gj3c5QknAlo2kmU9/j Kr5a8pRIC/xLhmpXRl0LLSlfEU45d7iBSPZ81QygyRPQT+fNBsuUo2aeX8win27ibz/O aRug== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f6si8454947ejx.293.2019.10.21.07.09.42; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 07:10:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729246AbfJUOI6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:08:58 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:45232 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728098AbfJUOI6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:08:58 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Oct 2019 07:08:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,323,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="209449335" Received: from lahna.fi.intel.com (HELO lahna) ([10.237.72.157]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 21 Oct 2019 07:08:52 -0700 Received: by lahna (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:08:52 +0300 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:08:52 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Karol Herbst Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , LKML , Lyude Paul , Linux PCI , Linux PM , dri-devel , nouveau , Linux ACPI Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pci: prevent putting nvidia GPUs into lower device states on certain intel bridges Message-ID: <20191021140852.GM2819@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20191016213722.GA72810@google.com> <20191021133328.GI2819@lahna.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 03:54:09PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > > I really would like to provide you more information about such > > workaround but I'm not aware of any ;-) I have not seen any issues like > > this when D3cold is properly implemented in the platform. That's why > > I'm bit skeptical that this has anything to do with specific Intel PCIe > > ports. More likely it is some power sequence in the _ON/_OFF() methods > > that is run differently on Windows. > > yeah.. maybe. I really don't know what's the actual root cause. I just > know that with this workaround it works perfectly fine on my and some > other systems it was tested on. Do you know who would be best to > approach to get proper documentation about those methods and what are > the actual prerequisites of those methods? Those should be documented in the ACPI spec. Chapter 7 should explain power resources and the device power methods in detail.