From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client    on interactive response
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:38:50 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>,
       Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <5.2.1.1.2.20060106074738.00bbaeb8@pop.gmx.net> <200601072030.59445.kernel@kolivas.org> <43C04F47.7000002@bigpond.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <43C04F47.7000002@bigpond.net.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200601081138.51198.kernel@kolivas.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 558
Lines: 14

On Sunday 08 January 2006 10:31, Peter Williams wrote:
> In any case and in the meantime, perhaps the solution is to use
> TASK_NONINTERACTIVE where needed but treat
> TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE|TASK_NONINTERACTIVE sleep the same as
> TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE sleep instead of ignoring it?

That's how I would tackle it.

Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/