Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:40:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:40:18 -0400 Received: from otter.mbay.net ([206.40.79.2]:38161 "EHLO otter.mbay.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 19:40:06 -0400 From: John Alvord To: David Schwartz Cc: , Concerned Programmer , Subject: Re: Tainted Modules Help Notices Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 16:40:25 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20011011224243.AAA24436@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> In-Reply-To: <20011011224243.AAA24436@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:42:41 -0700, David Schwartz wrote: > > >On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:37:27 +0100 (BST), Alan Cox wrote: > >>> If this is about maintainability, why not just a simple flag stating if >>> source is available or not. > >>Available under what terms, NDA'd, subject to unacceptable other rules etc.. >>Its not as simple as it looks > > I thought the issue was just whether or not people could get access to the >source code for debugging purposes. What we really need is a tag that simply >says, 'anyone can get the source code to this module for debugging purposes >[from this URL, maybe]'. URLs go bad and non-responsive regularly,,, john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/