Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 15:42:07 +0100
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc:     Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "james qian wang (Arm Technology China)" <james.qian.wang@arm.com>,
        "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Mihail Atanassov <Mihail.Atanassov@arm.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Subject: Re: [RFC,3/3] drm/komeda: Allow non-component drm_bridge only
 endpoints
Message-ID: <20191022144207.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <5390495.Gzyn2rW8Nj@e123338-lin>
 <20191016162206.u2yo37rtqwou4oep@DESKTOP-E1NTVVP.localdomain>
 <20191017030752.GA3109@jamwan02-TSP300>
 <20191017082043.bpiuvfr3r4jngxtu@DESKTOP-E1NTVVP.localdomain>
 <20191017102055.GA8308@jamwan02-TSP300>
 <20191017104812.6qpuzoh5bx5i2y3m@DESKTOP-E1NTVVP.localdomain>
 <20191017114137.GC25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <20191022084210.GX11828@phenom.ffwll.local>
 <20191022084826.GP25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <CAKMK7uHZ1Lw03LhZVH=oAa92WxZXucqooH1w6SG8HG20+g0Rbg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uHZ1Lw03LhZVH=oAa92WxZXucqooH1w6SG8HG20+g0Rbg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:50:42AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 10:48 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > I had a patches, which is why I raised the problem with the core:
> >
> > 6961edfee26d bridge hacks using device links
> >
> > but it never went further than an experiment at the time because of the
> > problems in the core.  As it was a hack, it never got posted.  Seems
> > that kernel tree (for the cubox) is still 5.2 based, so has a lot of
> > patches and might need updating to a more recent base before anything
> > can be tested.
> 
> 
> For reference, the panel patch:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10364873/
> 
> And the huge discussion around bridges, that resulted in Rafael
> Wyzocki fixing all the core issues:
> 
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg201927.html
> 
> James, do you want to look into this for bridges?

I can now confirm that it does work.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up