Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 09:01:11 -0700
From:   Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>
Cc:     Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>,
        linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] Convert all btwilink users to hci_ll and drop
 btwilink
Message-ID: <20191022160111.GP5610@atomide.com>
References: <20191003134147.9458-1-sre@kernel.org>
 <20191008143116.GF5610@atomide.com>
 <20191020203352.rh3n6qpagiyift7d@earth.universe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191020203352.rh3n6qpagiyift7d@earth.universe>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

* Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> [191020 20:34]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2019 at 07:31:16AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> [191003 06:42]:
> > > This moves the remaining users of btwilink to the "new" serdev based hci_ll
> > > driver and drops the btwilink driver afterwards. The patches were only compile
> > > tested by me, but Enric tested the IGEP platform and Adam will test the LogicPD
> > > platform.
> > > 
> > > I kept the TI_ST driver for now, since I plan to send a second patchset for the
> > > FM radio driver. Once the FM driver has been converted to also use hci_ll, we
> > > can remove TI_ST completly.
> > > 
> > > My suggestion is for the patch handling is, that everything simply goes through
> > > Tony's tree.
> > 
> > Sounds good to me, good to see kim gone with patch 3/4 :)
> > 
> > Marcel, care to ack the old driver removal patch?
> 
> Looks like Marcel missed the extra messages and merged the 4th
> patch, so I guess you can just merge patches 1-3. Technically that
> might lead to temporarily missing BT support on those two devices
> when the BT tree is merged before ARM tree during the merge window.
> Not a big issue I guess.

Sure no problem. Applying dts changes into omap-for-v5.5/dt
and the pdata quirk removal to omap-for-v5.5/soc.

I guess ti_wilink_st.h will need some follow-up patch to
remove unused platform data, but best to wait on that.

Regards,

Tony