Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191012191602.45649-1-dancol@google.com> <20191012191602.45649-4-dancol@google.com>
 <CALCETrVZHd+csdRL-uKbVN3Z7yeNNtxiDy-UsutMi=K3ZgCiYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKOZuevUqs_Oe1UEwguQK7Ate3ai1DSVSij=0R=vmz9LzX4k6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALCETrUyq=J37gU-MYXqLdoi7uH7iNNVRjvcGUT11JA1QuTFyg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUyq=J37gU-MYXqLdoi7uH7iNNVRjvcGUT11JA1QuTFyg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Daniel Colascione <dancol@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 14:27:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKOZueuhU05wXWcoAnfRM4rShuvQ8BteV32WTiWDmAA3-LBJfg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] Add a UFFD_SECURE flag to the userfaultfd API.
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
        Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@google.com>,
        Nick Kralevich <nnk@google.com>,
        Nosh Minwalla <nosh@google.com>,
        Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:14 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> [adding more people because this is going to be an ABI break, sigh]

Just pinging this thread. I'd like to rev my patch and I'm not sure
what we want to do about problem Andy identified. Are we removing
UFFD_EVENT_FORK?