Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932733AbWAHSWM (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:22:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932742AbWAHSWL (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:22:11 -0500 Received: from [139.30.44.16] ([139.30.44.16]:40270 "EHLO gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932733AbWAHSWB (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:22:01 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:22:00 +0100 (CET) From: Tim Schmielau To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: lkml , akpm Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] capable/capability.h (fs/) In-Reply-To: <20060107215115.7e6cb2a2.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Message-ID: References: <20060107215115.7e6cb2a2.rdunlap@xenotime.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 719 Lines: 20 On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap > > fs: Use where capable() is used. Acked-by: Tim Schmielau Note that sched.h, which currently holds capable(), already includes . So these patches are completely optional. Still I do appreciate these patches, since they reduce the amount of work I need to do when removing unnecessary sched.h includes. :-) Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/