Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8504:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id l4csp421010pjn; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:42:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgJecaZERMy72cPxPG+lTjcG4oLZvyn+nTaV7eda++rpYUQ3cJ1PYymyZXEIBeYksgrEk6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:858d:: with SMTP id v13mr21777476ejx.61.1571820168905; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:42:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571820168; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cmI6//45ZVh1B/K5Ir/nfm3JzqHXyDmglqR4bbVEdrfT2nnw171vfc8RjFnQqrnLf+ nfKgY0CHrVUmYKw24EuC95DYqRsZIzw+mzjDmdZT59ZFKOPNqccqV/w0JrwAaIsyyQj7 pJ04Wb0GQwoOQen0p/v86un4kORebBSKgCRHcaA5xnxTA0f0n+THMocga33bi7pGpSW/ XVIVex/Id/FSbjV1sEeregcdTONP6sy2V9QL5VPyOkVHpHFbz3xt65mxAQHOTxe5WbeE TH+4JXJXiIRxGY+bsWUc0TRH/rslTd31shecOJjO1J0T94a774duM+d2DYBYEw3S7svw ovfA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc:to:subject :from; bh=N4RQFx8nSKGqNa3tJdl6sO89iT7KZNnXYXHB1qKMplM=; b=LHuhGl+4FwS5xYlHVqptslMg3lpNQx4tW14/wCdaidSdcGPgA+EdQtAiymT0shVpId mq6BiNmoUp6PwaP+V+xOg1kotqKr8RINeGj8X3JdtY4FpOSX/X141DPsrLXQPgW4PMjb 6wipM0dhWjvuc+M803Y6rtBAmMyHs9xpV1zIZJZUfK4tbJ3q9Zh43Xvp2HQ+V5C9soIy CwN7vgjLcvVXR2QR0/aiKoyiXGaJnP8cEh5wfafxNCtbaIexZ6k2T1ozMI+gY39yTTFv toefA6So6iZXKMmUaRbxT1eeta76pZzQMUCXRX0Z2WINaEarVqsHd6pwzmhtyO6/RvH7 3alA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k5si2952343ejx.234.2019.10.23.01.42.25; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 01:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390473AbfJWIiv (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 04:38:51 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:2433 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389913AbfJWIiv (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 04:38:51 -0400 Received: from DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C961B789A126E53FB2EE; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:38:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:38:49 +0800 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.184.212.80) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:38:48 +0800 From: "liwei (GF)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] arm64: Relax ICC_PMR_EL1 accesses when ICC_CTLR_EL1.PMHE is clear To: Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , "Catalin Marinas" CC: Suzuki K Poulose , James Morse , Julien Thierry , , , , References: <20191002090613.14236-1-maz@kernel.org> <20191002090613.14236-2-maz@kernel.org> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:38:47 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191002090613.14236-2-maz@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.184.212.80] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggeme712-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.108) To dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, On 2019/10/2 17:06, Marc Zyngier wrote: > The GICv3 architecture specification is incredibly misleading when it > comes to PMR and the requirement for a DSB. It turns out that this DSB > is only required if the CPU interface sends an Upstream Control > message to the redistributor in order to update the RD's view of PMR. > > This message is only sent when ICC_CTLR_EL1.PMHE is set, which isn't > the case in Linux. It can still be set from EL3, so some special care > is required. But the upshot is that in the (hopefuly large) majority > of the cases, we can drop the DSB altogether. > > This relies on a new static key being set if the boot CPU has PMHE > set. The drawback is that this static key has to be exported to > modules. > > Cc: Catalin Marinas > Cc: Will Deacon > Cc: James Morse > Cc: Julien Thierry > Cc: Suzuki K Poulose > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 12 ++++++++++++ > arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h | 3 ++- > arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h | 19 ++++++++++--------- > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +-- > arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 6 ++++-- > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 2 ++ > 8 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h > index e0e2b1946f42..7d9cc5ec4971 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h > @@ -29,6 +29,18 @@ > SB_BARRIER_INSN"nop\n", \ > ARM64_HAS_SB)) > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI > +#define pmr_sync() \ > + do { \ > + extern struct static_key_false gic_pmr_sync; \ > + \ > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&gic_pmr_sync)) \ > + dsb(sy); \ > + } while(0) > +#else > +#define pmr_sync() do {} while (0) > +#endif > + Thank you for solving this problem, it helps a lot indeed. The pmr_sync() will call dsb(sy) when ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI=y and gic_pmr_sync=force, but if pseudo nmi is not enabled through boot option, it just take one more redundant calling than before at the following two place. I think change dsb(sy) to + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "dsb sy", \ + ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) \ + : : : "memory"); \ may be more appropriate. Thanks, Wei > > @@ -34,14 +35,14 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void) > } > > asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( > - "msr daifclr, #2 // arch_local_irq_enable\n" > - "nop", > - __msr_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, "%0") > - "dsb sy", > + "msr daifclr, #2 // arch_local_irq_enable", > + __msr_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, "%0"), > ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) > : > : "r" ((unsigned long) GIC_PRIO_IRQON) > : "memory"); > + > + pmr_sync(); > } > > static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void) > @@ -116,14 +117,14 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void) > static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags) > { > asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( > - "msr daif, %0\n" > - "nop", > - __msr_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, "%0") > - "dsb sy", > - ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) > + "msr daif, %0", > + __msr_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, "%0"), > + ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING) > : > : "r" (flags) > : "memory"); > + > + pmr_sync(); > } >