Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932766AbWAHUu3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:50:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932770AbWAHUu3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:50:29 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]:334 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932394AbWAHUu2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:50:28 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ajgAx95WkPgdm/ZBwPVwxXE0sKj150c+CZT2wtnRrq3vUd7ZVuoTgrhCiHsJZSVluTenncMo+VcSFNMqNaOA3Ke3gih/NC8iklg8CQge6nWX16yu8sd5kUBt9TxmzxDM+htTG0NAKmfFnVEVQR3ZmucPZgPJziAPWL0WwMXUMZI= Message-ID: <12c511ca0601081250h726b0e14u7703f9d6910891ee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:50:27 -0800 From: Tony Luck To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: git pull on Linux/ACPI release tree Cc: Junio C Hamano , Martin Langhoff , "Brown, Len" , "David S. Miller" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <46a038f90601081119r39014fbi995cc8b6e95774da@mail.gmail.com> <7vace61plu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1237 Lines: 26 I'll try to update the using-topic-branches document to capture this. Some of the problem is that it doesn't quite capture what I'm doing with my test/release branches. My release branch really is just used as a transfer point to Linus. I usually[1] don't leave patches sitting in "release" for long enough that I'll be tempted to merge in from Linus ... once I decide that some patches are ready to go to Linus I'll update "release" from Linus (which will be a fast-forward, so no history) merge in the topic branches, do one final sanity build, push to kernel.org and send the "please pull" e-mail. The huge majority of my "automatic update from upstream" merges go into my test branch ... which never becomes part of the real history as I never ask Linus to pull from it. -Tony [1] Sometimes I goof on this because I forget that I've applied a trivial patch directly to the release branch without going through a topic branch. I think I'll fix my update script to check for this case. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/