Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp1355979ybg; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:29:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxhOTh7C5OYyEAd+zIge3dl5Q6s8hCDCnXY8B7eEvpAM+0QBc8HhowNZsBLWk8ZD67Am+EG X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d209:: with SMTP id w9mr17073971ejz.40.1571866198901; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:29:58 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571866198; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BDkVV3thGkRZRHuIgSyvAKz1/K1/QNv6platHvTyY+8g29om0nQkNaDgcZr+eoYi4S IdclRaOdviuXyX3dYU39CAqcSKs7MB0UfwNt0zMEQCXOrtprd1mkOIOU7/h4o78E4wg4 mwap7JFkWMchR1ShNjFSOOCwrQRATWxRXdrojrbnv/9IsROAaVk3qkRaj9fJn/Q4sdRA tUS9OcWcSOKcM4ROfPe/eGn2clWbQBwURu+RXOpAeBqzwpS16iIaFIHifO+cxfnqYvkK cQoGithc9hWfVCSNjYiz8otDNjOyIeXs+Ul77vqXAZSf8F5V741J5cQi3IUGuxqV8dxe sRwA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=bKXOIplhzjtw8BbtCtvyFde5ko3uDitMFnr7KsmfPlg=; b=tnCtVoeWiaJbOAmzZRpzJZhLHNdLJT0gDZiSdpbRAaGPRH3IpW7ZDxLD1HrvQSB9+5 DnZy9D6fAAOXsJB1gAGX9Tzc58m5MrL1MVA5l6al71C2eVbLWtefMdjO3q24Je1Fj+4b yRRftjKKVm8tn9l8fEQNNcT15yHjqBnXwstxhBJ4GkvHNE/MPCEhHwlOfHj7leWOg51p yjDKmvTI1QV+smd64FY5SQtSYdgRbtIyKqFIUafe8cHdCPMzQCx9swqkimhBZaEGvNhE YhTEOubPppirMsuGDgAIvs37twh4SEiTaWX9UOlSip7njNqgvqY2BqMbqFshTY4DMOvt 578A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ck24si13390087ejb.400.2019.10.23.14.29.34; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405777AbfJWNWk (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:22:40 -0400 Received: from [217.140.110.172] ([217.140.110.172]:52010 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405770AbfJWNWj (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:22:39 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DFE4A7; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.105] (eglon.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.105]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABB1B3F6C4; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 06:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: arm-dmc520.txt To: Lei Wang Cc: Borislav Petkov , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" , "sashal@kernel.org" , "hangl@microsoft.com" , "lewan@microsoft.com" , "ruizhao@microsoft.com" , "scott.branden@broadcom.com" , "yuqing.shen@broadcom.com" , "ray.jui@broadcom.com" References: <20190923161015.GI15355@zn.tnic> <41637032-a308-9a92-1b49-cb51af2580f8@outlook.com> <1ae9a840-d5b6-ccd6-8481-d43665b4411b@arm.com> From: James Morse Message-ID: <70e31777-f4c0-fdd2-fcae-6589d355dd28@arm.com> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:22:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Lei, On 21/10/2019 18:36, Lei Wang wrote: >> It looks like your patches didn't make it to the mailing list: >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/BY5PR04MB6599EAA659A53B2331CB812586890@BY5PR04MB6599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com >> >> You can search on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac/, I can only see the replies from the >> people who received it directly. >> >> I can't see anything obvious in the headers that would cause it to get rejected. Did you >> get any bounces/errors from the list? >> >> Depending on how the DT folk work, this may be why you haven't had a response yet. Tools >> like patchwork will depend on the message reaching the list. > > Yes I got reject from > > linux-edac@vger.kernel.org > devicetree@vger.kernel.org This is very likely the reason the DT folk haven't seen this. > with the reason of > > vger.kernel.org gave this error: > Hello [40.92.9.51], for your MAIL FROM address > policy analysis reported: Your address is not liked source for email > > I'll resend from another email address that hopefully the email list > likes. Is there some guideline on what email addresses are liked and not > liked? There doesn't seem to be a list, I guess subscribe and see if it works. (You should subscribe to a list before posting to it. It avoids issues like this) outlook.com is mentioned here: http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/pipermail/kernelnewbies/2018-January/018562.html and a few more details on yahoo and AOL here: https://kernelnewbies.kernelnewbies.narkive.com/F9mlJOst/why-the-email-of-yahoo-com-can-t-subscribe-majordomo-vger-kernel-org Petition your employer for a working email setup? (or use gmail...) Thanks, James