Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:30:49 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, acme@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com,
        kan.liang@linux.intel.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] perf affinity: Add infrastructure to save/restore
 affinity
Message-ID: <20191023143049.GS22919@krava>
References: <20191020175202.32456-1-andi@firstfloor.org>
 <20191020175202.32456-5-andi@firstfloor.org>
 <20191023095911.GJ22919@krava>
 <20191023130235.GF4660@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191023130235.GF4660@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 06:02:35AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:59:11AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:51:57AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >=20
> > SNIP
> >=20
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/affinity.h b/tools/perf/util/affinity.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..e56148607e33
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/affinity.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +#ifndef AFFINITY_H
> > > +#define AFFINITY_H 1
> > > +
> > > +struct affinity {
> > > +=09unsigned char *orig_cpus;
> > > +=09unsigned char *sched_cpus;
> >=20
> > why not use cpu_set_t directly?
>=20
> Because it's too small in glibc (only 1024 CPUs) and perf already=20
> supports more.

nice, we're using it all over the place.. how about using bitmap_alloc?

jirka