Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964965AbWAHWYD (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:24:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964836AbWAHWYD (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:24:03 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:30597 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964965AbWAHWYC (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:24:02 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:24:02 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: reiserfs mount time Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 796 Lines: 20 Hi, brought to attentino on an irc channel, reiser seems to have the largest mount times for big partitions. I see this behavior on at least two machines (160G, 250G) and one specially-crafted virtual machine (a 1.9TB disk / 1.9TB partition - took somewhere over 120 seconds). Here's a dig http://linuxgazette.net/122/misc/piszcz/group001/image002.png from http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz So, any hint from the reiserfs developers how come reiserfs takes so long? Standard mkreiserfs options (none extra passed). Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/