Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BY5PR04MB6599EAA659A53B2331CB812586890@BY5PR04MB6599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <20190923161015.GI15355@zn.tnic> <e2b9cd68-abaa-bdcd-cc56-cca285272569@outlook.com>
 <41637032-a308-9a92-1b49-cb51af2580f8@outlook.com> <BY5PR04MB65996A0CEB37001C763B248C866C0@BY5PR04MB6599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <1ae9a840-d5b6-ccd6-8481-d43665b4411b@arm.com> <BY5PR04MB659953E22E846D0BF4384D0086690@BY5PR04MB6599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <70e31777-f4c0-fdd2-fcae-6589d355dd28@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <70e31777-f4c0-fdd2-fcae-6589d355dd28@arm.com>
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:22:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+m-3ojBWH9ni0NFJ08WxqQ784-Y1WcF_h19F=uUExrqw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: arm-dmc520.txt
To:     James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc:     Lei Wang <leiwang_git@outlook.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        "mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "mchehab@kernel.org" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        "linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
        "sashal@kernel.org" <sashal@kernel.org>,
        "hangl@microsoft.com" <hangl@microsoft.com>,
        "lewan@microsoft.com" <lewan@microsoft.com>,
        "ruizhao@microsoft.com" <ruizhao@microsoft.com>,
        "scott.branden@broadcom.com" <scott.branden@broadcom.com>,
        "yuqing.shen@broadcom.com" <yuqing.shen@broadcom.com>,
        "ray.jui@broadcom.com" <ray.jui@broadcom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 8:22 AM James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Lei,
>
> On 21/10/2019 18:36, Lei Wang wrote:
> >> It looks like your patches didn't make it to the mailing list:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/r/BY5PR04MB6599EAA659A53B2331CB812586890@BY5PR04MB6599.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
> >>
> >> You can search on https://lore.kernel.org/linux-edac/, I can only see the replies from the
> >> people who received it directly.
> >>
> >> I can't see anything obvious in the headers that would cause it to get rejected. Did you
> >> get any bounces/errors from the list?
> >>
> >> Depending on how the DT folk work, this may be why you haven't had a response yet. Tools
> >> like patchwork will depend on the message reaching the list.
> >
> > Yes I got reject from
> >
> > linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
>
> > devicetree@vger.kernel.org
>
> This is very likely the reason the DT folk haven't seen this.

Yes, if it doesn't go to the DT list and into patchwork, then it goes
with the other 95K unread emails and maybe I see it.

Rob