Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161243AbWAHXbX (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:31:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161248AbWAHXbX (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:31:23 -0500 Received: from viper.oldcity.dca.net ([216.158.38.4]:30180 "HELO viper.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161243AbWAHXbW (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:31:22 -0500 Subject: Re: reiserfs mount time From: Lee Revell To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:31:17 -0500 Message-Id: <1136763077.2997.4.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 884 Lines: 23 On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 23:24 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Hi, > > > brought to attentino on an irc channel, reiser seems to have the largest > mount times for big partitions. I see this behavior on at least two > machines (160G, 250G) and one specially-crafted virtual machine > (a 1.9TB disk / 1.9TB partition - took somewhere over 120 seconds). > Here's a dig http://linuxgazette.net/122/misc/piszcz/group001/image002.png > from http://linuxgazette.net/122/TWDT.html#piszcz > So, any hint from the reiserfs developers how come reiserfs takes so long? > Standard mkreiserfs options (none extra passed). > reiser3 or reiser4? Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/