Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp2094486ybg; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyvuB60gZJ9cpBhRP+kR5QlMJP9uwJymMEq0aXcpkrS3ErIns39oNc1x1NsC5++Ddp4rqhx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d972:: with SMTP id rp18mr13277295ejb.179.1571917549310; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571917549; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PCnQAJO78YJfLZNmGaqJxbaOoqf+wdSMPBe6dcxctt4ycfdnsVsB17+vVwW2ZEzUJi Qq1AEF9CDALQ4VX29apX7MjdmL6amm4ESQqicSI1N9hB4Tlg2VYSas9VB5QrSoL3V+CP Iz63DX2wSjLab//pirDZEc8MQJPqB0IHwV6iwIEFqF2BnRyO+gS6wzq/nLcUrCNbsMVD W+FBLGzgfThEYfD2o9nSV+mm+vx5+2zN8N9Aifr3IDsSS14laaEZfTZn7DSlu/F1mJ+P HjVRBZjC6RhjKURZaxkZJSgAouVXExZZ7haVkTLiTNDrnwhzfIZA1kfhd3u2+lGsPf5e m6NQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:to:from:subject; bh=34j7W5nqalBkKeuwqO9uMRZ6zTTVzVKhWtp8BJccIA0=; b=NWnmkqjYz5YIw5/jl/MB6KCV4nw+tK2lRNvguXoIlpAJ7//Q6av8D5OVFI/3B17iMA pGwGvVq+4KOcxqJm11jJYu3RcS+xR4VYhW8wu2BW5AtgmbIY99GUziDF2hs7hCs9ipLd /9m/VgI7Og/9l7pu3w0sQX/50+AKKhQ0mUef2E056p7ry+8Gzewyr4mI5z+GpTGUKsp3 Dx8u6Rqe04ENInuuPWth/e5oZLCkJEfsrlExWbM8LlLROlkmRQY8pKxOzOPBlD9nnASb EIxCzXgmTIbTxz/GIkyUwVoLut6dRQg8GLzcX73kNh+QTl91HNYTc+EQhBnQN1q96LOl GTew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 9si2752256ejw.272.2019.10.24.04.45.24; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:45:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727125AbfJWRDc (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:03:32 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:29920 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727093AbfJWRDc (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:03:32 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9NH2XFK026741 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:03:31 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vtskfbb9m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:03:30 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:03:29 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:03:25 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9NH3OYv45678840 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:03:24 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2ACD5205F; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:03:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.184.174]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCEE52051; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:03:22 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] KEYS: ima hook to measure builtin_trusted_keys From: Mimi Zohar To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian , dhowells@redhat.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com, sashal@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 13:03:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6a3f2efa-fc05-7bfd-368a-910dd4525f4c@linux.microsoft.com> References: <20191023001818.3684-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> <20191023001818.3684-4-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> <1571836931.5104.95.camel@linux.ibm.com> <6a3f2efa-fc05-7bfd-368a-910dd4525f4c@linux.microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19102317-0008-0000-0000-0000032637FB X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19102317-0009-0000-0000-00004A45683A Message-Id: <1571850201.5104.149.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-23_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910230163 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 07:49 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: > On 10/23/19 6:22 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > Thanks for reviewing the changes Mimi. > I'll address your comments and post an updated patch set shortly. > > >> Add a new ima hook to measure keys added to builtin_trusted_keys > >> keyring. > > > > There is no IMA hook in this patch. > > > > >> + else if (strcmp(args[0].from, > >> + "BUILTIN_TRUSTED_KEYS") == 0) > >> + entry->func = BUILTIN_TRUSTED_KEYS; > >> else > >> result = -EINVAL; > >> if (!result) > > > > Any new options need to be displayed as well. > > Not that I can think of. Please correct me if I am wrong. True, since you're hard coding the policy.