Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp2102730ybg; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:53:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyJHfbzJu4bYr9d2prL3YMR2M1nDPIEhFzw9weyBFuu6H5bfn9K15o81//jScKV63PwIh+l X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:68d5:: with SMTP id y21mr37360943ejr.272.1571918015314; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:53:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571918015; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=w986aeQGwdNCgB7JhEW2eBQiCkxubYEs9XyYKvEnu+S5rZ3RQxXuu1RxTvtnzaYHJV xwx6g3kpWd9TdW1As7fQBS/c7rZbBs0Oi5C9cdlIzOJWOQw1StDNowE5UeFeBH2ckCgs YWHscPDPc2RVEqJyQVamapky6NAtVi71F3HqLEXTI1v771DMBV3RtpKmyVccPheJ9Cm9 kJdOFQsS8e6s6QML1V3N1Mg/Xea0MfoIJlPFpdwGbS4bA+HBql5MTgHHqFt4AdaSxw70 MtZAvX2lbgoDYJ9aZ/KOnTaVD4FNRT0Po8OGs2R4dATaNrIjP9WjqpSa+/ANWMd1pUBu mihA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=9k47AFRlEzEcICGdkvU7r4M2xnFRD9h1i+pjKocWyLs=; b=diqisXxaqgcroeqweIRWC2gvUKh/3KqfspvyJcj6xkRqBTn0i8ymUMLEr807M1vTYR D8la0uyEy3JjJmVqQxnKgMmAo6DTksBHHF3sCROX3yJoDT5Z3SKOHBzRF2+YbVTgzleM 2erDny7S//RmfXm9oxdTdQ/Ag9dF81L+dzGsZSNfRRqkz51OkrdogeHf/b9ZKah4gxVZ bsKn1HQ95ZjzsyzZLZeCi3iHUaAIUWgJHhnw9Jm0RkSBlFz82yoGswyRKU3S+6EHV0T8 ouUUz1ZWrQUfnWAf1VovCOBtUthobhqT20lmCrD7Q/5KZErT8PniErex2Awkffie4sOb gh7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ks17si6734838ejb.210.2019.10.24.04.53.11; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387593AbfJWSBY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:01:24 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52602 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387516AbfJWSBY (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:01:24 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13E4AD46; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 20:01:21 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Waiman Long Cc: Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , Roman Gushchin , Vlastimil Babka , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Jann Horn , Song Liu , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rafael Aquini Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, vmstat: Release zone lock more frequently when reading /proc/pagetypeinfo Message-ID: <20191023180121.GN17610@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20191023102737.32274-3-mhocko@kernel.org> <20191023173423.12532-1-longman@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191023173423.12532-1-longman@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 23-10-19 13:34:22, Waiman Long wrote: > With a threshold of 100000, it is still possible that the zone lock > will be held for a very long time in the worst case scenario where all > the counts are just below the threshold. With up to 6 migration types > and 11 orders, it means up to 6.6 millions. > > Track the total number of list iterations done since the acquisition > of the zone lock and release it whenever 100000 iterations or more have > been completed. This will cap the lock hold time to no more than 200,000 > list iterations. > > Signed-off-by: Waiman Long > --- > mm/vmstat.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c > index 57ba091e5460..c5b82fdf54af 100644 > --- a/mm/vmstat.c > +++ b/mm/vmstat.c > @@ -1373,6 +1373,7 @@ static void pagetypeinfo_showfree_print(struct seq_file *m, > pg_data_t *pgdat, struct zone *zone) > { > int order, mtype; > + unsigned long iteration_count = 0; > > for (mtype = 0; mtype < MIGRATE_TYPES; mtype++) { > seq_printf(m, "Node %4d, zone %8s, type %12s ", > @@ -1397,15 +1398,24 @@ static void pagetypeinfo_showfree_print(struct seq_file *m, > * of pages in this order should be more than > * sufficient > */ > - if (++freecount >= 100000) { > + if (++freecount > 100000) { > overflow = true; > - spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lock); > - cond_resched(); > - spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock); > + freecount--; > break; > } > } > seq_printf(m, "%s%6lu ", overflow ? ">" : "", freecount); > + /* > + * Take a break and release the zone lock when > + * 100000 or more entries have been iterated. > + */ > + iteration_count += freecount; > + if (iteration_count >= 100000) { > + iteration_count = 0; > + spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lock); > + cond_resched(); > + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock); > + } Aren't you overengineering this a bit? If you are still worried then we can simply cond_resched for each order diff --git a/mm/vmstat.c b/mm/vmstat.c index c156ce24a322..ddb89f4e0486 100644 --- a/mm/vmstat.c +++ b/mm/vmstat.c @@ -1399,13 +1399,13 @@ static void pagetypeinfo_showfree_print(struct seq_file *m, */ if (++freecount >= 100000) { overflow = true; - spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lock); - cond_resched(); - spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock); break; } } seq_printf(m, "%s%6lu ", overflow ? ">" : "", freecount); + spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lock); + cond_resched(); + spin_lock_irq(&zone->lock); } seq_putc(m, '\n'); } I do not have a strong opinion here but I can fold this into my patch 2. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs