Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751231AbWAIKLW (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:11:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751235AbWAIKLW (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:11:22 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.193]:32919 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751229AbWAIKLV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:11:21 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UuF6pYCZyAxTf8CccMeZ3HD9T/jXu3gCxMcA6BiEoKpr8EjOJDiGckC0EUCQkEWdoTuJ3enk6vKCUNjcPCcMuDEYxwnA+RoTRll+L15Ooyypm0kQQoqSz7kfG5DyAGe5tbQ/dHbfLBS6kOtMYz39pzaeKy/QjIoe1eHdKidwvn4= Message-ID: <46a038f90601090211j33479764q13c74df60033a061@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:11:20 +1300 From: Martin Langhoff To: "Brown, Len" Subject: Re: git pull on Linux/ACPI release tree Cc: "David S. Miller" , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1145 Lines: 30 On 1/9/06, Brown, Len wrote: > I appologize for using the phrase "completely insane". > The rebase proposal caught me somewhat off-guard and > I was expressing surprise -- hopefully not taken as insult. > > Further, I thank you for your thoughful follow-up. No worries... and no offence taken! In a sense we are still exploring possible/desirable workflows and what the missing pieces are. And yes, some thing don't quite make sense from the outside, perhaps because they just don't or because we arent' explaining them very well. In a sense, we do have a bit of a challenge explaining what how all the parts fit together, even to bk old timers it seems. > While I don't expect it to become a routine occurnece for me, > I do see that rebase has utility in some situations. As long as you've got enough tools to use a workflow that fits you, it's all good. cheers, martin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/