Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4028063ybg; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:17:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyoR2yN05VEqbHI+Pz0gK3tcvbIOvtH5OwnsJ7z2G/3Q7P+AAAViG5vuAWMDVnR/WLsUc23 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:49d1:: with SMTP id w17mr5131878ejv.101.1572031049098; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:17:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572031049; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oB3O2j4dyR+cN+l29auyPT/LlKYQcOSxwBXRm6zTrqQOJcKdz9cZPz1GqmSUiaZ6s5 mG4joM9ZQIk3Z7moBC4KcC/rRb8e9xJGGN3HPQADCju7eH+o5pMsb+ly5A7P8EZoInWd c+W1RJAnfOW/fD1FUJSa2pzusF6w3Z9QE8XKtBipKFZuD+DZhYrZLXSjXhvSZlEXaGPl YNqjyoT7xLCGLLssfTnxR0vLtiNkoUjFcNA7lh71/DbCtP5j3K5wMiGBK/thdZX8yW4Q oFEA+I3+ZJ/kWIBiuQF5PzzDm1fMMu4Fyamwy0eh5x2vgA+DwK3zcw1MUvVIpFWkL5ch uhTA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:from:subject:references :mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=ykFrkrtkEuTw1kHPTs7ZKgy0svb1H2iYZiKkqKmnwyo=; b=YQjW3Rw1bu+frlhbPnc1UCLJb7CTlD2dZ4NiiYBr/juwQ+f1B1sk27HlKPPtZdviYC QnXSfOxVPQz+M2d2eFZ4H1HdoarFRP1DwY85D1p4nBS3BtY2fuiRXmEXEahxg7VuyaKZ fEHIAkSvjPMBT0/IihxRd4Fbju1wPsCSr+8vNMAKeZqw3AqG4Q1z4QH/FkLiOYABNy2Q qCvm6axTjNGA2uo2HdSt2Pi6rDauYiX5B7A9T1ZaMN8Yt2smissunVD06pO9VIfhxzAV b/bZ6g2nOum9P/k29PkI4WJI6reN9ttHQ8RVG4qEitx/GFVFH1ZsmcASviGIsWuBbyZu jLcA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=caAydi5e; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c27si1763904ede.425.2019.10.25.12.17.05; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=caAydi5e; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387824AbfJYApi (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:45:38 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f202.google.com ([209.85.219.202]:54693 "EHLO mail-yb1-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727108AbfJYAph (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Oct 2019 20:45:37 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f202.google.com with SMTP id k79so611688ybf.21 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:45:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=ykFrkrtkEuTw1kHPTs7ZKgy0svb1H2iYZiKkqKmnwyo=; b=caAydi5ejwcAIKJB+h/wUp8YdaIkgAPPznlLGZBkHbnI6yj2GkZKxIkLsh/yxTN7xc VAnEO9LWW8EFcUph6sYxzx6b0gKkJlX30tmIljhyc3mTyRmEjsEpRNsvzB+71uOWCSQt 2hw+6NiU+kX7ZDh8GtMNEUgv1mVZ7FArsc6GhCYr9IxwTx6FK3hg6e4ngvKNiVcvEy6a BzfEs4n3534cyL8HRkXAYSg3BfqC0q9pKHVJVF9R00Z+qvuDIZCQeeyWQocwZbuclchU 7vvJs317Gq6UDwoBUFAMNxBYh2aI9SaRA/LHPLmc8in9XojzLpJdrXxdCdhvXMb9zjkx OIZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ykFrkrtkEuTw1kHPTs7ZKgy0svb1H2iYZiKkqKmnwyo=; b=EMkkarMR6HfPhYMZKbp1fYqv8wrw/bm5z9o77THPqBbN8Yn54N8VZPDQR5kbHpId1F cEhot7t8F7eRETD/kJGodHwdEbaCDsBpyJmSJBS+Ip8gePcyZpBZHS6MicsH7Xkacr0d 2wfF6WM1nsjjyo/v28FtwHWCG1DDolCQBlj7eCSjt0hq2taopleIyVSCGKaUjFil2Ug7 uRJW8xAPFFI5ytojoqquCDsCW8iJ3LNj/MzJeJiMfAK1PhTEqX6zgitiXsZsdwrbECp+ vfHSw4L8RfKXcImpjV2oc0K/LXkmF5PJ1Dc1UpMOl1wE2t03joFhHiipGkwdTikE99Us vifQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW/xVqtIEP/QiScRHZtnTR+bLhXTr8CHNV6y9UgROP12MUSaeZ7 v2NpPIwNSp3nI1krkmkpy/6lBtTYQuU= X-Received: by 2002:a25:afca:: with SMTP id d10mr1027880ybj.54.1571964336762; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 17:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:45:31 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20191018010846.186484-1-pliard@google.com> Message-Id: <20191025004531.89978-1-pliard@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20191018010846.186484-1-pliard@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0.rc0.303.g954a862665-goog Subject: Re: [PATCH] squashfs: Migrate from ll_rw_block usage to BIO From: Philippe Liard To: phillip@squashfs.org.uk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, groeck@chromium.org, pliard@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Personally speaking, just for Android related use cases, I'd suggest > latest EROFS if you care more about system overall performance more > than compression ratio, even https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/22/814 is > applied (you can do benchmark), we did much efforts 3 years ago. > > And that is not only performance but noticable memory overhead (a lot > of extra memory allocations) and heavy page cache thrashing in low > memory scenarios (it's very common [1].) Thanks for the suggestion. EROFS is on our radar and we will (re)consider it once it goes out of staging. But we will most likely stay on squashfs until this happens.