Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932071AbWAIMpT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:45:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932091AbWAIMpT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:45:19 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.140.247.100]:46476 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932071AbWAIMpS (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:45:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:44:45 -0200 From: Luiz Fernando Capitulino To: Pekka Enberg Cc: arjan@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Adds missing kmalloc() checks. Message-Id: <20060109104445.22dde5d5.lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> In-Reply-To: <1136599971.7163.3.camel@localhost> References: <20060106131246.0b9fde8c.lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> <1136561087.2940.39.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060106133051.367f2d9b.lcapitulino@mandriva.com.br> <1136599971.7163.3.camel@localhost> Organization: Mandriva X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.8 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i586-mandriva-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1564 Lines: 42 Hi Pekka, On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 04:12:50 +0200 Pekka Enberg wrote: | Hi, | | On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 13:12 -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote: | > | > Adds two missing kmalloc() checks in kmem_cache_init(). Note that if the | > | > allocation fails, there is nothing to do, so we panic(); | | On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:24:47 +0100 | Arjan van de Ven wrote: | > | ok so what good does this do? if you die this early.. you are in deeper | > | problems, and can't boot. while this makes the code bigger... | | On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 13:30 -0200, Luiz Fernando Capitulino wrote: | > Well, you'll get a panic with a message saying you have no memory to | > boot, instead of a OOPS with a kernel NULL pointer derefecence, which | > will make you look for a bug. | | The code is in init section so I don't think size is an issue. A plain | BUG_ON would be better though as it can be disabled by the embedded | folk. Okay, but a quick look at the initialization functions called from 'init/main.c' shows that some of them does the same thing (test an error condition, and panic() if necessary). Should they be changed to call BUG_ON() instead? PS: I'm asking becuase I also found several untested returns, I'll send patches for they too. -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/