Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 19:13:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 19:13:01 -0500 Received: from TSX-PRIME.MIT.EDU ([18.86.0.76]:45200 "HELO tsx-prime.MIT.EDU") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 19:12:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 19:12:29 -0500 Message-Id: <200011110012.TAA22015@tsx-prime.MIT.EDU> From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" To: "Matt D. Robinson" CC: Christoph Rohland , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com, Paul Jakma , Michael Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Matt D. Robinson's message of Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:36:31 -0800, <3A0C402F.8F0BA261@alacritech.com> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Generalised Kernel Hooks Interface (GKHI) Phone: (781) 391-3464 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:36:31 -0800 From: "Matt D. Robinson" As soon as I finish writing raw write disk routines (not using kiobufs), we can _maybe_ get LKCD accepted one of these days, especially now that we don't have to build 'lcrash' against a kernel revision. I'm in the middle of putting together raw IDE functions now -- see LKCD mailing list for details if you're curious. Great! Are you thinking about putting the crash dumper and the raw write disk routines in a separate text section, so they can be located in pages which are write-protected from accidental modification in case some kernel code goes wild? (Who me? Paranoid? :-) - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/