Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 12:42:30 +0200
From:   Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Such=E1nek?= <msuchanek@suse.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc:     linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
        Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
        Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] cdrom: factor out common open_for_* code
Message-ID: <20191025104230.GN938@kitsune.suse.cz>
References: <cover.1571834862.git.msuchanek@suse.de>
 <da032629db4a770a5f98ff400b91b44873cbdf46.1571834862.git.msuchanek@suse.de>
 <20191024021958.GA11485@infradead.org>
 <20191024085014.GF938@kitsune.suse.cz>
 <20191025023908.GB14108@infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20191025023908.GB14108@infradead.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 07:39:08PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:50:14AM +0200, Michal Such?nek wrote:
> > Then I will get complaints I do unrelated changes and it's hard to
> > review. The code gets removed later anyway.
> 
> If you refactor you you pretty much have a card blanche for the
> refactored code and the direct surroundings.

This is different from what other reviewers say:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1517245320.2687.14.camel@wdc.com/

Either way, this code is removed in a later patch so this discussion is
moot. It makes sense to have a bisection point here in case something
goes wrong but it is pointless to argue about the code structure
inherited from the previous revision.

Thanks

Michal