Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] io-wq: fix unintentional integer overflow on left
 shift
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20191025124315.21742-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
 <fc23061e-31ec-8a66-2b62-771121d182de@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <02517010-9244-771f-d0ce-558bbebe6a63@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:56:00 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fc23061e-31ec-8a66-2b62-771121d182de@kernel.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 10/25/19 6:54 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/25/19 6:43 AM, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>>
>> Shifting the integer value 1U is evaluated with type unsigned int
>> using 32-bit arithmetic and then used in an expression that expects
>> a 64-bit value, so there is potentially an integer overflow. Fix this
>> by using the BIT_ULL macro to perform the shift and avoid the overflow.
> 
> Good catch, that should indeed have been 1ULL. I'll fold in your
> fix, thanks!

BTW, this missed the same issue on the clear side of it, in
io_worker_handle_work(). I've fixed that one up the same way.

-- 
Jens Axboe