Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:55:01 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     daniel.thompson@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de,
        linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, baohua@kernel.org,
        stephan@gerhold.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] mfd: mfd-core: Protect against NULL call-back
 function pointer
Message-ID: <20191025145501.GG4568@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20191024163832.31326-1-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <20191024163832.31326-9-lee.jones@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191024163832.31326-9-lee.jones@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 05:38:30PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> If a child device calls mfd_cell_{en,dis}able() without an appropriate
> call-back being set, we are likely to encounter a panic.  Avoid this
> by adding suitable checking.

Reviwed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

--Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl2zDMQACgkQJNaLcl1U
h9ABgQf9FLxe+CJ2ib38kOHsh+dWrewAHj3LPciwqrFUCQbdp/vtXpAjmCnHy0t6
5RbtY52V8l9ePzKffJ/H0KmmtEvXGEgosPbR/0i662aeVTmOyme7W4pZXMTTLMJ/
JIPMccu6ocWmYHsGy9QRE8ogdOQ6oC5Gmys1FDDj3iHI7MV+byj5tLco6eqGpH9+
8fsfGfwAzwJfDXyoyMpjrtsivvJfXGTgYr0ozd5dVliSkRwABpNoRXCxi5QAqCUt
Sm6unj7LOFcmt2GYtrNgg/utcd+A5coT55CCWA5Ib2/yB9KTj++tt2xr6C7FzQJG
38r3tEQ2oyzlkqLRc1Nl+oZDX7IcFw==
=WgfW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Ls2Gy6y7jbHLe9Od--