Subject: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux
	can't for a long time
From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Yaroslav Rastrigin <yarick@it-territory.ru>,
       Kasper Sandberg <lkml@metanurb.dk>,
       Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>, andersen@codepoet.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <1136822827.6659.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <174467f50601082354y7ca871c7k@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200601091403.46304.yarick@it-territory.ru>
	 <1136813783.8412.4.camel@localhost>
	 <200601091656.48355.yarick@it-territory.ru>
	 <1136822827.6659.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:15:12 -0500
Message-Id: <1136823313.9957.37.camel@mindpipe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 652
Lines: 16

On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 16:07 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Currently Linux performance loading large binaries is at least
> perceptually worse than Windows (some of that is perceptual tricks
> windows apps pull, some of it real). 

Would you care to elaborate on this statement?  It's not clear to me how
perception could differ from reality in this case.  If it seems faster
doesn't that mean it is faster?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/