Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4133960ybg; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:52:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw+/vZWel7BkxM9wFOBxuCC3O3jfcOOdLBI0gSEfQVDaI8iARrWiWgoFY+W2RcUYY5M+e2C X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2ccc:: with SMTP id r12mr5084234ejr.249.1572036758252; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:52:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572036758; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=scUtkvrNEHKV2KJ5QrGVCYykryh95X0LMGVJh+kQBXtnjC4Z/pV5frszMI3URvyWdC eYiR3SGtd7g8jQTtsWvohA0nI53I4Q4M/0ZIdLcmt0joNjo61fx+yJuW54+kF3qRfonK pY/Uh01VSZNtmA0rfSdTlr8ohdVs363G6hNrwYsSEYaeAS48ZmgUFwKRI3wIG6GLeBfJ I/SEnpiH7sn0krJSMNDsS3fTjoeIkNOPq7nHBCJ1c98VAC3viKXOxRNLeLkXHMpXeo1V N+XQ+5DNBUeQOT6kZb4NmsqitCI17D5DCFmP+sgKGZBFpWr8rwhXDHjhwjH4gI3O+XwE Bf/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=6cwH51K7LHpxfi+lU8DaDgg+F6Z5RlVCE4PabHGZn6A=; b=rixF4u8peambqPxWiHQolcgUZ0ui6tRwvGoq0UxadAPV0THc5v27LwaO1hcineOhKr r9K01EBmsSAmzi+yHB3TTrdTltkOlpYvx+HxZH77qJyqQu9IxiyETULB5bU7nm7l1SrK crG1P4D0BA118VKJvrZ+choHiyl1eit52iZ0hknnlUR3VMCWedAZmAUiwlsrLPBt0Ahp u9KEnjlT6jhE3+Xdp6VA5JgF95ZJ4BfwjVfM/RJqVv22S6POtr5b0FAGeT+52TQ99RcQ qVfRNpMOH8xY8Fq4eBg34dZI4MwGUwUoc29ZwvTwTXF4RfPDWFXFc3SABBgP0cqcNx6y Bv0A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p4si1954609ejj.334.2019.10.25.13.52.15; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388437AbfJYSOo (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:14:44 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:27306 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388171AbfJYSO0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:14:26 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2019 11:14:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,229,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="198093803" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.137]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Oct 2019 11:14:24 -0700 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C774130038C; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:14:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Andi Kleen To: acme@kernel.org Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Optimize perf stat for large number of events/cpus v3 Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:14:10 -0700 Message-Id: <20191025181417.10670-1-andi@firstfloor.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [v3: Address review feedback. Fix minor bug and rebase to latest tip/perf/core avoiding one reject.] This patch kit optimizes perf stat for a large number of events on systems with many CPUs and PMUs. Some profiling shows that the most overhead is doing IPIs to all the target CPUs. We can optimize this by using sched_setaffinity to set the affinity to a target CPU once and then doing the perf operation for all events on that CPU. This requires some restructuring, but cuts the set up time quite a bit. In theory we could go further by parallelizing these setups too, but that would be much more complicated and for now just batching it per CPU seems to be sufficient. At some point with many more cores parallelization or a better bulk perf setup API might be needed though. In addition perf does a lot of redundant /sys accesses with many PMUs, which can be also expensve. This is also optimized. On a large test case (>700 events with many weak groups) on a 94 CPU system I go from real 0m8.607s user 0m0.550s sys 0m8.041s to real 0m3.269s user 0m0.760s sys 0m1.694s so shaving ~6 seconds of system time, at slightly more cost in perf stat itself. On a 4 socket system with the savings are more dramatic: real 0m15.641s user 0m0.873s sys 0m14.729s to real 0m4.493s user 0m1.578s sys 0m2.444s so 11s difference in the user visible set up time. Also available in git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ak/linux-misc perf/stat-scale-5 v1: Initial post. v2: Rebase. Fix some minor issues. v3: Rebase. Address review feedback. Fix one minor issue -Andi