Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>,
        Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>,
        Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@suse.com>,
        Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.3 167/197] CIFS: avoid using MID 0xFFFF
Date:   Sun, 27 Oct 2019 22:01:25 +0100
Message-Id: <20191027203403.359847100@linuxfoundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20191027203351.684916567@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20191027203351.684916567@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.66
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>

commit 03d9a9fe3f3aec508e485dd3dcfa1e99933b4bdb upstream.

According to MS-CIFS specification MID 0xFFFF should not be used by the
CIFS client, but we actually do. Besides, this has proven to cause races
leading to oops between SendReceive2/cifs_demultiplex_thread. On SMB1,
MID is a 2 byte value easy to reach in CurrentMid which may conflict with
an oplock break notification request coming from server

Signed-off-by: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
CC: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/cifs/smb1ops.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb1ops.c
@@ -171,6 +171,9 @@ cifs_get_next_mid(struct TCP_Server_Info
 	/* we do not want to loop forever */
 	last_mid = cur_mid;
 	cur_mid++;
+	/* avoid 0xFFFF MID */
+	if (cur_mid == 0xffff)
+		cur_mid++;
 
 	/*
 	 * This nested loop looks more expensive than it is.