Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 28 Oct 2019 09:35:37 -0700
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     eric@anholt.net, wahrenst@gmx.net, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: replace g_free_fragments_mutex
 with spinlock
Message-ID: <20191028163537.b2pspgdl6ceevcxv@linux-p48b>
References: <20191027221530.12080-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <20191028155354.s3bgq2wazwlh32km@linux-p48b>
 <20191028162412.GA321492@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191028162412.GA321492@kroah.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Greg KH wrote:
>This is obviously not in a format I can apply it in :(

What are you talking about? I sent you the original patch,
then Cc'ed the drivers mailing list. So you still have a
patch you can apply... this is quite a common way of doing
things (Ccing for future references to someone or another
ml). I don't understand why you are hairsplitting over this
patch.

Thanks,
Davidlohr