Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:59:09 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc:     devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, eric@anholt.net, wahrenst@gmx.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: replace g_free_fragments_mutex
 with spinlock
Message-ID: <20191028165909.GA469472@kroah.com>
References: <20191027221530.12080-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <20191028155354.s3bgq2wazwlh32km@linux-p48b>
 <20191028162412.GA321492@kroah.com>
 <20191028163537.b2pspgdl6ceevcxv@linux-p48b>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191028163537.b2pspgdl6ceevcxv@linux-p48b>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 09:35:37AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Greg KH wrote:
> > This is obviously not in a format I can apply it in :(
> 
> What are you talking about? I sent you the original patch,
> then Cc'ed the drivers mailing list. So you still have a
> patch you can apply... this is quite a common way of doing
> things (Ccing for future references to someone or another
> ml). I don't understand why you are hairsplitting over this
> patch.

I don't understand what is going on at all.  Is this patch already
applied?  If not, then yes, I need it in a format I can apply it in.  If
it's already applied to my tree/branch, then there's no need to send it
at all.

totally confused,

greg k-h