Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMz4kuJAwV7f=pjUqs1nO3+L5NbcwCQrCi-HGUPPXgp7rWUs=g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1571722391.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org> <487c2e45810c6dc6485638474136e375cb567807.1571722391.git.baolin.wang@linaro.org>
 <50696230-75f4-3de4-7424-c33d531ee159@intel.com> <CAMz4kuJAwV7f=pjUqs1nO3+L5NbcwCQrCi-HGUPPXgp7rWUs=g@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:38:30 +0800
Message-ID: <CAMz4kuKfqMoM3WdaG8o0JHpXeUZHYpLt4P15BsOriU2h2OV--A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: host: sdhci: Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        baolin.wang7@gmail.com, linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:27, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 16:20, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 22/10/19 8:58 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > > Add request_done ops for struct sdhci_ops as a preparation in case some
> > > host controllers have different method to complete one request, such as
> > > supporting request completion of MMC software queue.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |   12 ++++++++++--
> > >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h |    2 ++
> > >  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > index b056400..850241f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> > > @@ -2729,7 +2729,10 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host)
> > >
> > >       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
> > >
> > > -     mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
> > > +     if (host->ops->request_done)
> > > +             host->ops->request_done(host, mrq);
> >
> > For hsq, couldn't this result in sdhci_request() being called interrupt
> > context here.
>
> Right, now it did not support.
>
> >
> > To prevent that you would need to add a condition to sdhci_defer_done() so
> > it always defers when using hsq.
>
> Yes, but now the condition can be matched in sdhci_defer_done()  when
> using hsq. So no need to worry that the sdhci_request() will be called
> in interrupt
> context in this patch set. Thanks.
>

Wait, sorry, I realized some drivers may not select the
SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA flag in sdhci_defer_done()  when using hsq. OK, So
how about below changes?

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 850241f..6c7a396 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -3035,7 +3035,7 @@ static inline bool sdhci_defer_done(struct
sdhci_host *host,
 {
        struct mmc_data *data = mrq->data;

-       return host->pending_reset ||
+       return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMC_HSQ) || host->pending_reset ||
               ((host->flags & SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA) && data &&
                data->host_cookie == COOKIE_MAPPED);
 }

-- 
Baolin Wang
Best Regards