Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S275552AbRJLJ7c>; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 05:59:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S277298AbRJLJ7W>; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 05:59:22 -0400
Received: from Expansa.sns.it ([192.167.206.189]:4104 "EHLO Expansa.sns.it")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S275571AbRJLJ7Q>;
	Fri, 12 Oct 2001 05:59:16 -0400
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 11:59:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Luigi Genoni <kernel@Expansa.sns.it>
To: "T. A." <tkhoadfdsaf@hotmail.com>
cc: J Sloan <jjs@pobox.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Which kernel (Linus or ac)?
In-Reply-To: <OE394qrvAsp4XgWZGbR0000e29d@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110121156030.4318-100000@Expansa.sns.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, T. A. wrote:

>
>     I know.  Please don't remind me of UnixWare.  I buried that at my
> clients' and companies' sites in the Linux 1.2.x days.
>
> > x.0 release: New stuff, interesting, buggy
> > x.1 release: A passable cleanup of the bugs in .0
> > x.2 release: A smooth, polished, evolution of .1
>
>     Well here's hoping that 7.2 is smooth and polished.  Especially since
> Redhat has become the defacto standard and I'll probably be trying it out
> again.
>
Please, this is just the wrong mental attitude. I have nothing against red
hat distribution, but the just one standard is LSB one (I do admitt, many
people from Red Hatm, SuSE and other distributions worked on it).
If a distribution is LSB compliant, it is standard. usually de facto
standard tend to vanish with the time.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/