Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Cc:     baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>,
        Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
        Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
References: <1571946904-86776-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
 <1571946904-86776-10-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
 <a9a1c3ed-0134-f531-fbf1-789f6cc78ce3@linux.intel.com>
 <20191028152945.13bc22fa@jacob-builder>
 <e4ac7f82-a224-3388-88ae-1ce52d2eec58@linux.intel.com>
 <20191028211121.4ba2f332@jacob-builder>
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <0907d1ef-e36d-4bc5-8715-bc0c50a78a5c@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:04:34 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191028211121.4ba2f332@jacob-builder>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 10/29/19 12:11 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:54:48 +0800
> Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>  wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/29/19 6:29 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
>>> Hi Baolu,
>>>
>>> Appreciate the thorough review, comments inline.
>> You are welcome.
>>
>>> On Sat, 26 Oct 2019 10:01:19 +0800
>>> Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>  wrote:
>>>    
>>>> Hi,
>>>>   
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> +			 * allow multiple bind calls with the
>>>>> same PASID and pdev.
>>>>> +			 */
>>>>> +			sdev->users++;
>>>>> +			goto out;
>>>>> +		}
>>>> I remember I ever pointed this out before. But I forgot how we
>>>> addressed it. So forgive me if this has been addressed.
>>>>
>>>> What if we have a valid bound svm but @dev doesn't belong to it
>>>> (a.k.a. @dev not in svm->devs list)?
>>>>   
>>> If we are binding a new device to an existing/active PASID, the code
>>> will allocate a new sdev and add that to the svm->devs list.
>> But allocating a new sdev and adding device is in below else branch,
>> so it will never reach there, right?
>>
> No, allocating sdev is outside else branch.

Oh, yes! Please ignore it.

Best regards,
baolu