Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4153058ybg; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:00:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqybtX5liY/BmNWKSB+lw+tPPTsGKR87s6XtO/4i5Cd2sJ9836s7HrWxbAGaiZjv8NQ7MrkD X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c358:: with SMTP id j24mr25193601edr.147.1572343201248; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:00:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572343201; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vyiqnylWRCXtMWqdTJDrlXzezciH/zLCctJKj+yjGmoj83c7HjHp+utp4aiyUFRfrn s+jcPbGkPuw5Gext8tri5U4onfQAa9nmwnbi1wSTx6Q1QP0hG6mfTVf+dfu7eAJzTbSr 7CMIGkmVmumx3xmFsWQkGwNxAeQtCLciPuVusfHVCi4IrRcshgeA25d6TjB9COS3wW4W SfBsGMj6hSmjVholZdBzJskwTmVg53ug0Q2ngsyKJPUQI3wiVW302aSM8Fr5g1h5isb6 rHI0wGbzKGDRSl1syKXKYkgtGHg4jswt5Ra21eZVQ/zFTSB0eCqziKT3MIGgDKoAB2WW DRWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :dlp-reaction:dlp-version:dlp-product:content-language :accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id:date:thread-index :thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=XQ8vwJOU9jEchM8Urh/9EF1TcCYUZpY+IbB1XyzciII=; b=bfAm51ZeB/iHPkLyE3u7Kw1r5bHoFqPn9utVGEBOfdQ1U1zhIHN9IhU0x7Xa+X2Y1q 53m0t7Qsdk193Zv1vtJnKhXdcZ/ih4xXzhSJe7OIvVurmK/hrfRbFUvX84NY+bWFz4y7 4BY9xHjsAzqlPNo64/UqhscSZOm98ilNYHZXtdENifAgIxLrFlJ4Cgv1k3URymrsWTwK x3La8TpzKXLb4ymyvxgVwWOimQKfvpG8SgnQvjXYLMdzXKXOIsqNs0OohRRYAGJbYGRO sxR2+W1h/QOAKZ+JEaGwCJU5n1W/kSC3SLRF9f8WuF9zOEDWCz3dv9klj0Zqduyy3s4F ZwIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h52si9757002edb.77.2019.10.29.02.59.36; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:00:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728289AbfJ2H5Y convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:57:24 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:52465 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727443AbfJ2H5Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:57:24 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Oct 2019 00:57:23 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,243,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="224890907" Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2019 00:57:23 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.86) by FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:57:23 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.86) by fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:57:22 -0700 Received: from shsmsx106.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.159) by fmsmsx606.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:57:22 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.127]) by SHSMSX106.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.10.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:57:21 +0800 From: "Tian, Kevin" To: Jacob Pan CC: "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , LKML , Joerg Roedel , "David Woodhouse" , Alex Williamson , Jean-Philippe Brucker , "Liu, Yi L" , "Raj, Ashok" , Christoph Hellwig , Lu Baolu , Jonathan Cameron , Eric Auger Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support Thread-Topic: [PATCH v7 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support Thread-Index: AQHViqRYHs7rkU/ej0S5OBwc0DBZHqdq78JwgAApg4CABHtLgIAAIj+AgAGQXhA= Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 07:57:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1571946904-86776-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <1571946904-86776-10-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20191025103337.1e51c0c9@jacob-builder> <20191028090231.4777c6a9@jacob-builder> In-Reply-To: <20191028090231.4777c6a9@jacob-builder> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMDI5YWJlMTMtZTdmYS00Njk4LTk3NTEtYjZmNzM4YjExYjkwIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoieVFHdUhSeEh5alAwcUtaNk5rNENId2hcL003RW03VVBncGprUXFNY3AySGdYOW5uU1h4KzA3TWI0amhjOUszc3YifQ== dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 12:03 AM > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 06:03:36 +0000 > "Tian, Kevin" wrote: > > > > > > + .sva_bind_gpasid = intel_svm_bind_gpasid, > > > > > + .sva_unbind_gpasid = intel_svm_unbind_gpasid, > > > > > +#endif > > > > > > > > again, pure PASID management logic should be separated from SVM. > > > > > > > I am not following, these two functions are SVM functionality, not > > > pure PASID management which is already separated in ioasid.c > > > > I should say pure "scalable mode" logic. Above callbacks are not > > related to host SVM per se. They are serving gpasid requests from > > guest side, thus part of generic scalable mode capability. > Got your point, but we are sharing data structures with host SVM, it is > very difficult and inefficient to separate the two. I don't think difficulty is the reason against such direction. We need do things right. :-) I'm fine with putting it in a TODO list, but at least need the right information in the 1st place to tell that current way is just a short-term approach, and we should revisit later. thanks Kevin