Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:09:23 +0100
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To:     Praveen Chaudhary <praveen5582@gmail.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, fw@strlen.de, kadlec@netfilter.org,
        pablo@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhenggen Xu <zxu@linkedin.com>,
        Andy Stracner <astracner@linkedin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [netfilter]: Fix skb->csum calculation when netfilter
 manipulation for NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC\DST is done on IPV6 packet.
Message-ID: <20191029160923.GB876@breakpoint.cc>
References: <1572301675-5403-1-git-send-email-pchaudhary@linkedin.com>
 <1572301675-5403-2-git-send-email-pchaudhary@linkedin.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1572301675-5403-2-git-send-email-pchaudhary@linkedin.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Praveen Chaudhary <praveen5582@gmail.com> wrote:
> No need to update skb->csum in function inet_proto_csum_replace16(),
> even if skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, because change in L4
> header checksum field and change in IPV6 header cancels each other
> for skb->csum calculation.

Can you resend this and submit this patch to
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org?

You may add:
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>