Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4674343ybg; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:40:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxLa5yFpFS2tY03maF1P1UES3+nmKNnabpoTkzZtEg2fxXb4/dKC2pjUSv/cLcnbCgZWQGW X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3c7:: with SMTP id t7mr27104131edw.232.1572370813782; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:40:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572370813; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=P2eOimn2BGANZrwsZVKS4Sre6H5Vf0hMr+N/9nMM/m8ofjY+Bdf0o1gMWnqoZaOvPS pYJgimGoArq8NRB/3i72Pg2avmK0zpK9I3psotWZMhc4U1Jm6s2OlrC1SC5/lmRNL7rC eZwbwAsDvjkJG9gP03xtCIh04Aw8zZMxREfRJ3Ni8oXnhM1YDYLn8/J/7UZjjfK4G00C WrceRhk3VtsT4x3g96s04RVI1bRzcw4kCtzhK7anLqHzcmr9DjiNySEiodsxbuozqJRX Jmm0TSUGE6bebT3Jyj9NXUWxW9bekJAyskCh4qGWLIElF/VwenbEWKvELcEm0YzFltuY f7zw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=GENQOkaFvVatZv1GMFR3zbGCbH5x94AbSDwlQyYRy4k=; b=yBjX62OxbYen59pCPN1ivy3U41WQOG7uveoSUqGLSF+J/mlk59/yGkjbSsy4a8EczU 5W2AoDPOXbgoZpM6S44FCpxHJ1N+RQWuqQELomUZQ5BTVSeAy4VKcedrsBHnLSdYWMRW bMOMtEgFibEPPysr+KkJtNQCX29pYh0fRfcKmi6qh9STAM0lbyed2amkApNvXNRYpVTs jNhx3WTEYMrN9tKzv50qI46CyURvx4TtWQJkHkvM/8X+lrnowlOeuRAv9D74NqdgI6f/ M0B+k3RSLMp+kyRiRwVxhhAbrQiF9NGMGY0ym/Z6w2ZrA+cjf+yw4iohE55MTvxaT1kz y8Vw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=ryNYsmDL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v24si5742223ejx.2.2019.10.29.10.39.37; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=ryNYsmDL; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729288AbfJ2Ixg (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:53:36 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:59186 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726377AbfJ2Ixf (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:53:35 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9T8rMdP075590; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:53:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1572339202; bh=GENQOkaFvVatZv1GMFR3zbGCbH5x94AbSDwlQyYRy4k=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ryNYsmDLJEX96Q+mU0OivEDViSqNSb3nMrcJpZ1CwikrLprdf3c1ZFwFLFEGyr7Z4 bjY4DGY2VwoPy0uOWRd4JCMwAgwubYxlHYWPTXUntK8Ky3GoXdkre/Nmar9eZ/SrHJ sZVM/v/z2jsQ1peboThHmeA9SGFCGu6tzGoGz8ds= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9T8rMG2086926 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:53:22 -0500 Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:53:10 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:53:10 -0500 Received: from [172.24.190.117] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9T8rIvA090581; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:53:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] soc: ti: k3: add navss ringacc driver To: Peter Ujfalusi , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , References: <20191001061704.2399-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20191001061704.2399-3-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> From: Lokesh Vutla Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:22:14 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191001061704.2399-3-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Grygorii, [...snip..] > + > +static int k3_ringacc_ring_access_io(struct k3_ring *ring, void *elem, > + enum k3_ringacc_access_mode access_mode) > +{ > + void __iomem *ptr; > + > + switch (access_mode) { > + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_PUSH_HEAD: > + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_HEAD: > + ptr = (void __iomem *)&ring->fifos->head_data; > + break; > + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_PUSH_TAIL: > + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_TAIL: > + ptr = (void __iomem *)&ring->fifos->tail_data; > + break; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + ptr += k3_ringacc_ring_get_fifo_pos(ring); > + > + switch (access_mode) { > + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_HEAD: > + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_TAIL: > + dev_dbg(ring->parent->dev, > + "memcpy_fromio(x): --> ptr(%p), mode:%d\n", ptr, > + access_mode); > + memcpy_fromio(elem, ptr, (4 << ring->elm_size)); Does this work for any elem_size < 64 or any element size not aligned with 64? IIUC, in message mode, ring element should be inserted in a single burst write and there is no doorbell facility. If the above conditions are not met, we are supposed to use proxy. In this driver, I don't see any restrictions on the ring element size for message mode and directly written to io. Am I missing something? Thanks and regards, Lokesh > + ring->occ--; > + break; > + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_PUSH_TAIL: > + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_PUSH_HEAD: > + dev_dbg(ring->parent->dev, > + "memcpy_toio(x): --> ptr(%p), mode:%d\n", ptr, > + access_mode); > + memcpy_toio(ptr, elem, (4 << ring->elm_size)); > + ring->free--; > + break; > + default: > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + dev_dbg(ring->parent->dev, "free%d index%d occ%d index%d\n", ring->free, > + ring->windex, ring->occ, ring->rindex); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int k3_ringacc_ring_push_head_io(struct k3_ring *ring, void *elem) > +{ > + return k3_ringacc_ring_access_io(ring, elem, > + K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_PUSH_HEAD); > +} > + > +static int k3_ringacc_ring_push_io(struct k3_ring *ring, void *elem) > +{ > + return k3_ringacc_ring_access_io(ring, elem, > + K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_PUSH_TAIL); > +} > + > +static int k3_ringacc_ring_pop_io(struct k3_ring *ring, void *elem) > +{ > + return k3_ringacc_ring_access_io(ring, elem, > + K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_HEAD); > +} > + > +static int k3_ringacc_ring_pop_tail_io(struct k3_ring *ring, void *elem) > +{ > + return k3_ringacc_ring_access_io(ring, elem, > + K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_HEAD); > +} > +