Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4835102ybg; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:08:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZebRVeQOTl31OW8Ri0TwphK5dQuFLxKyWuOoe9SweYldwNaTyxSlPeRdHZQIrQxhAEJCn X-Received: by 2002:a50:fa82:: with SMTP id w2mr27906954edr.30.1572379689372; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:08:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572379689; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pJ2Qn+4fs8+af1/vNdsn9AwJBFWCe9Xc8vL2xiuv1WW90NzfBLosRPMqcofhnlMv+Z Eh+juyEEutvj0QaF/qUC8KW4byczNsh+P9Z3KzfR7mOPAagDYmDZpoDtCzfqCMEPtor0 EiZrvCaqzBh9mBqhjWOYj4XTEYYOt8FFfs41IQS7jipmMJ+sYwy8b+YTcDTd7ePbk014 uVpafGldJJHuYl6ERmvT9/jbNzlYCaPi/p0IjeKP8yfmwc5mVETpi47AYAgePDlZ2lD3 c3XWtIy7R9D7KuFtfpoBjLZAU/ic/dmYPWtR2mL9KP7a6qn7a4gxKvcZTqKu8z1PHj/x ILCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dmarc-filter:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=czShE1y8z9Uyc1aMIOps2ljDeUwy12BW7meI21miH5Q=; b=XiYNl/gLELU5O/lHGtLCpAGlsHM3hyaOZ0ZehJ891+li5FwxW0EJGLBM2AnjGbNhAJ es9kEmYGO4uvqfyesip7NZ2n8q30lsPkKFPEdAcwxOfEhXpPERUmnK49lq5exsgvuHV3 6rCDqU6Tro8+jwF1nfe5xnhMnyPSvKeMS+SfKC5SFSuyebmeOA+mNYEG9trmElAjtOxZ Ab2iCliKMXh3yzYWWPp3W55jcIZKZe3BjN8fivmQgsVTxYyX493hB8ugXcH5dGD46fmx D/iIAn49Ugu428UsALOuPILYr5ttWqr4xOkGzs7I4IV/hgbZEVxifLCjWQzKqj+bdVmR NS2A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b="Ob/h5JsR"; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b="Ob/h5JsR"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j1si9122420ejv.216.2019.10.29.13.07.45; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b="Ob/h5JsR"; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b="Ob/h5JsR"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733143AbfJ2TmE (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:42:04 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:58654 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731976AbfJ2TlR (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:41:17 -0400 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAB776101A; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:41:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1572378076; bh=xqAqpfTz0MYS2QzAykQoW/gQ3PLb9xPmN77DGBErdDY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ob/h5JsRgpLBR3aGNUS0GcT65eRkobT2Qns6KK8kN4r6YoYmlQI6KxRWGNFxbLAsG FvCTBKysBsI92mWYxweuvSY6zXMg3GykpUhaervTnI93FAHjQqSmXCSjzMlNC1DsdS ZX/SQLcd73wZTbVU20opJ7a3zlP36RO7SqxJFrkQ= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from eberman-linux.qualcomm.com (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eberman@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 180DE61066; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:41:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1572378076; bh=xqAqpfTz0MYS2QzAykQoW/gQ3PLb9xPmN77DGBErdDY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ob/h5JsRgpLBR3aGNUS0GcT65eRkobT2Qns6KK8kN4r6YoYmlQI6KxRWGNFxbLAsG FvCTBKysBsI92mWYxweuvSY6zXMg3GykpUhaervTnI93FAHjQqSmXCSjzMlNC1DsdS ZX/SQLcd73wZTbVU20opJ7a3zlP36RO7SqxJFrkQ= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 180DE61066 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=eberman@codeaurora.org From: Elliot Berman To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, saipraka@codeaurora.org, agross@kernel.org Cc: tsoni@codeaurora.org, sidgup@codeaurora.org, psodagud@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Elliot Berman Subject: [RFC 09/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Improve SMC convention detection Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:40:57 -0700 Message-Id: <1572378065-4490-10-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1572378065-4490-1-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org> References: <1572378065-4490-1-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - Use enum to describe SMC convention. - Improve SMC convention detection to use __qcom_scm_is_call_available instead of circumventing qcom_scm_call_smccc. - Improve SMC convention detection to check that SMCCC-32 works, instead of just assuming it does of SMCCC-64 does not. Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman --- drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c index c83eb1d..4d7fd3e 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c @@ -58,7 +58,13 @@ struct arm_smccc_args { unsigned long a[8]; }; -static u64 qcom_smccc_convention = -1; +enum qcom_smc_convention { + SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN, + SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32, + SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64, +}; + +static enum qcom_smc_convention qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN; static DEFINE_MUTEX(qcom_scm_lock); #define QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_WAIT_MS 30 @@ -103,7 +109,9 @@ static int ___qcom_scm_call_smccc(struct device *dev, smc.a[0] = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL( atomic ? ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL : ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL, - qcom_smccc_convention, + (qcom_smc_convention == SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64) ? + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64 : + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, desc->owner, SMCCC_FUNCNUM(desc->svc, desc->cmd)); smc.a[1] = desc->arginfo; @@ -117,7 +125,7 @@ static int ___qcom_scm_call_smccc(struct device *dev, if (!args_virt) return -ENOMEM; - if (qcom_smccc_convention == ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32) { + if (qcom_smc_convention == SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32) { __le32 *args = args_virt; for (i = 0; i < SMCCC_N_EXT_ARGS; i++) @@ -579,19 +587,15 @@ int __qcom_scm_qsmmu500_wait_safe_toggle(struct device *dev, bool en) void __qcom_scm_init(void) { - u64 cmd; - struct arm_smccc_res res; - u32 function = SMCCC_FUNCNUM(QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO, QCOM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL); - /* First try a SMC64 call */ - cmd = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64, - ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP, function); - - arm_smccc_smc(cmd, QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1), cmd & (~BIT(ARM_SMCCC_TYPE_SHIFT)), - 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res); - - if (!res.a0 && res.a1) - qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64; - else - qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32; + qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64; + if (__qcom_scm_is_call_available(NULL, QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO, + QCOM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL) <= 0) { + /* Now try a SMC32 call */ + qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32; + if (__qcom_scm_is_call_available(NULL, QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO, + QCOM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL) <= 0) { + qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN; + } + } } -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project