Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:39:57 +0200
From:   Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>
To:     "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Cc:     Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+24c12fa8d218ed26011a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
        axboe@kernel.dk, josef@toxicpanda.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in nbd_ioctl
Message-ID: <20191030083957.GD25097@grep.be>
References: <000000000000b1b1ee0593cce78f@google.com>
 <5D93C2DD.10103@redhat.com>
 <20191017140330.GB25667@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191017140330.GB25667@redhat.com>
Organization: none
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:03:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 04:19:25PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> > Hey Josef and nbd list,
> > 
> > I had a question about if there are any socket family restrictions for nbd?
> 
> In normal circumstances, in userspace, the NBD protocol would only be
> used over AF_UNIX or AF_INET/AF_INET6.

Note that someone once also did work to make it work over SCTP. I
incorporated the patch into nbd-client and nbd-server, but never
actually tested it myself. I have no way of knowing if it even still
works anymore...

[...]
-- 
To the thief who stole my anti-depressants: I hope you're happy

  -- seen somewhere on the Internet on a photo of a billboard