Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:25:40 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2G memory split
Message-ID: <20060110142540.GK3389@suse.de>
References: <20060110125852.GA3389@suse.de> <17347.47882.735057.154898@alkaid.it.uu.se> <20060110135404.GF3389@suse.de> <43C3C023.9040308@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <43C3C023.9040308@suse.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 883
Lines: 20

On Tue, Jan 10 2006, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> changing PAGE_OFFSET.  As the whole point of this split patchery is to 
> avoid highmem in the first place it maybe makes sense to have some 
> "optimize for 1/2/4/more GB main memory" config option which in turn 
> picks sane PAGE_OFFSET+HIGHMEM+PAE settings?

Forgot to comment on that... Yes that is indeed an option, but it's a
little complicated since it depends on the role of the machine. A file
server may want a very small user land virtual memory size, whereas a
database server may want the opposite. So I think it's still saner to
expose a select range of settings.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/