Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191029180731.2153b90c@canb.auug.org.au> <CADYN=9+aqqHVP8tKFFCTKi_zzSt=PW5JVyU2sdaThgrHpYSjzQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191030105553.GH25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20191030105553.GH25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
From:   Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:21:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CADYN=9L4i7BWcdhOdG-AFQjuZBU=gv7UjcV6CaO2f0q_KJKhVg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 29
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 11:56, Russell King - ARM Linux admin
<linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Please trim your replies; there's no need to force everyone to page
> through 500 lines of Stephen's email to get to the content of your
> message.

Right, I'll keep that in mind next time.

>
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:25:19AM +0100, Anders Roxell wrote:
> > When I'm building an arm kernel with this .config [1], I can see this
> > build error on next tag next-20191029 and next-20191030. Tag
> > next-20191028 built fine.
> >
> >
> > $ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- -skj$(getconf
> > _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) O=obj-arm-20191029 zImage
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.o: in function
> > `trace_hardirqs_on':
> > trace_preemptirq.c:(.text+0x2a0): undefined reference to `return_address'
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: trace_preemptirq.c:(.text+0x2dc): undefined
> > reference to `return_address'
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.o: in function
> > `trace_hardirqs_off':
> > trace_preemptirq.c:(.text+0x468): undefined reference to `return_address'
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: trace_preemptirq.c:(.text+0x494): undefined
> > reference to `return_address'
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.o: in function
> > `start_critical_timings':
> > trace_irqsoff.c:(.text+0x798): undefined reference to `return_address'
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld:
> > kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.o:trace_irqsoff.c:(.text+0xed4): more
> > undefined references to `return_address' follow
> > make[1]: *** [/srv/src/kernel/next-testing/Makefile:1074: vmlinux] Error 1
> > make[1]: Target 'zImage' not remade because of errors.
> > make: *** [Makefile:179: sub-make] Error 2
> > make: Target 'zImage' not remade because of errors.
>
> Known problem with one of Ben Dooks patches, which was dropped very
> quickly when Olof's builder spotted the issue...

aha, I missed that.

> though it looks like
> I didn't push it out.

OK.

Cheers,
Anders