Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp834857ybx; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:56:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywtfIiSoZIS5rt5yr9lzpKzl+XjTHiQz8AHjdeAi0K16ecIcH+zBTISjwRYNzE8YSdOAGL X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c048:: with SMTP id k8mr20763699edo.254.1572440168350; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:56:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572440168; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=v8YIQbQXoZ26wqP0rXgcbmeuQuLU40C0x682EWKxyAQMY3rtOIU1/dmEezMOgFWCTU egcIWO76PDLC6iMtm4FplNIN7BxU1WSNja8M6MldxbIgEexea5LJ0z2J9IU67IkCfp1f RU/BaGsxuYyXFiv05QrAJ8hgZoAPAiXkR0rlBXbUOWZx4+TK6XI91ck64eewJxSAHVIs ShqjMM7WNgYbWaazANa7nL29wFVPGpo5y4asLrDNqh1qVvXgQGi+oRN1TLzhfhwse+DD VYHPqr3JG38pghFbMFN2bgTkMmYi803QEyZ+movWN8wyD+jWmJaWuNgwxlp5ABnyZKzy 8x8Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=BchOSg6wnAs4oKRFihXNzsMJLvwqYQWlHqnAgNcHqY8=; b=APo76vurSmV1qEJmZ7boOUkD/GYDYTzPs1z3Y+qvU56ZYAfhuZiRF7mvjQSSobUnX4 H9U3lTjMMWC8GLePytoi2D2KAAM4WXv4vdmAB+SdGlwl6wd+AcADNMkdzGt5qbINXBiy Q07rJOikouVoCjTcS/jmyBMAZrJNceM5ULH5XSxACxhzfGucTLDNiZRnIeNUQ9wQFak/ NHNtW4LIReIMfO2eJBZw/Z2nZdL2bEjpjy6WyEZ7W4zt1NlLs/M+UAC3ZLGoSsvAZbAc NNUrIxmaeroZWJXUCHV1g7uqC+Ps1tHmE40HWUdspIiqGNJIY13fM4gCi/rx2f/2UQ7s ltMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=TY3HOcZX; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h14si1610309edj.225.2019.10.30.05.55.45; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=TY3HOcZX; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726612AbfJ3Mw4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:52:56 -0400 Received: from mail-vs1-f66.google.com ([209.85.217.66]:38537 "EHLO mail-vs1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726239AbfJ3Mwz (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:52:55 -0400 Received: by mail-vs1-f66.google.com with SMTP id b123so1551246vsb.5 for ; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:52:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BchOSg6wnAs4oKRFihXNzsMJLvwqYQWlHqnAgNcHqY8=; b=TY3HOcZXz3quEBuy7fHsMjhrFE0WkkI7EiCmK49VpTfpnIsZOpSHpopNmfwVkz8Loh j7WR7bpjzfPHFNOhi4AvUlT5fkpWGB5a2+blG9sqLaQ0qLlAmRE/YKYUe80eFDTMfmdS eQ1kQYm3whnddeyBwN1hufnAu6Ylyygm8FNZ9mvx5DKuZ1NRJwaWg4ODXSSb6WSfrFTT tg3X8+ZU6lo7iuYKitQ6sS68cPTcOCCoCEVcrBARr8RcYMJhBJ5VZgPWinNSZizGujWE i0cNwm0CPsjCf6cWj8NulOk/tWGveONmIaK6fo91j/mFiKcbIa4noDvXNifRGP/EPDfz O83w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BchOSg6wnAs4oKRFihXNzsMJLvwqYQWlHqnAgNcHqY8=; b=Oo7mCLZGfpRsqPCYcZsywSDK324PuJHw7x7IrkdJthodvyPgZhA6ag3oCJTe+a5j7n 0RR7YZY2B0dyf+L6/9EnQNkxMc+WlU2RL+MbnfuQoeU3lanf4rjv2WwFabIoHeMAn0SX 7LDb0M3l8g97VVHzHHW2a2QSBYoGuFDPv/hL6ApSuBa76iQWk2iY8Dpr9KQ3fhU5qGw8 q9gZ1EEJ7x9us2TGvB74l7YjanrNSWetUT9nmsFr8nGol4y1SxQLSiioMT0udGI4R7jA iM6dUMTPeWo6X8vqLT5mEZ0k4hKDZnDfgsHLNIP0vV4aTCjTq67rK3ITDTfbLUSjvip2 Df4g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXI3BuIsBVT06B635+snq5vvbwHDQlGFT6t3XTYdFVvS7eohpAM HHbTbClQDuXBXRGmdEvZA2G4kBt0RMM2H5uA+AECRg== X-Received: by 2002:a67:f5c1:: with SMTP id t1mr4971361vso.9.1572439974693; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 05:52:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191022114910.652-1-colin.king@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: From: Amit Kucheria Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 18:22:43 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] drivers: thermal: tsens: fix potential integer overflow on multiply To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: Colin King , Andy Gross , Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , Stephen Boyd , Linux PM list , linux-arm-msm , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 1:10 AM Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 22/10/2019 13:49, Colin King wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King > > > > Currently a multiply operation is being performed on two int values > > and the result is being assigned to a u64, presumably because the > > end result is expected to be probably larger than an int. However, > > because the multiply is an int multiply one can get overflow. Avoid > > the overflow by casting degc to a u64 to force a u64 multiply. > > > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow") > > Fixes: fbfe1a042cfd ("drivers: thermal: tsens: Add interrupt support") > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > > --- > > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c > > index 03bf1b8133ea..3d7855106ecd 100644 > > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens-common.c > > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ void compute_intercept_slope(struct tsens_priv *priv, u32 *p1, > > > > static inline u32 degc_to_code(int degc, const struct tsens_sensor *s) > > { > > - u64 code = (degc * s->slope + s->offset) / SLOPE_FACTOR; > > + u64 code = ((u64)degc * s->slope + s->offset) / SLOPE_FACTOR; > > > - u64 code = ((u64)degc * s->slope + s->offset) / SLOPE_FACTOR; > + u64 code = div_u64(((u64)degc * s->slope + s->offset), > SLOPE_FACTOR); This implementation should handle 32-bit architectures too. Colin, could you respin? Regards, Amit