Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp854705ybx; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:12:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyV9CSlSIjpA8hn+FphHFwLyJuspAUE7NUcZ3JFKdSk9p3V8k3l4hUAd3Iru84SwiUftZcS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3e41:: with SMTP id t1mr8934081eji.103.1572441179621; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:12:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572441179; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hT1v8z8k0ffELCcyijWj1Q0VsMbuiPJoMU1ZVh6VtI7rmXChTMwrP8XAdsnKdLAxj0 B85n8j5FalxrWvnu/dgS0U1z6o9UzwKNToZaJG8QeOn4C4d/tGBhTDfY8IuARZZlRywR YKD3xojE2rNCGxiMMRKy4NSc4rI36BpBMCfah3yvCh8jN84IaA51DQ57aoZfe9bgJxbL jD9wX1jO08ByHESFYLq0tDSldmuJMrTCH0MYO92AQKYvXX/e3FtOp84Oj6AQnVIcqVcL 4UnQNa0vSFT3DXn+Qmai6ejrG50rGIzEX5/k0OhA/RlBx0pIPjgCFLLQdAKO+Q40Xi0K t9jA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=M5l3IXLPZ7PbLcGaD/x5qSLUDpxoQyE8oFPSKxV0M6M=; b=Go+lQcaMsIciAclLbx6n+Rm71x9DmLsZe/rh+d2E4/vDx5uL7vUrfV/elbzjXdfFnU Vh+3dYGPxKqnfDf43MOIGBZeBbz3kUKSQPzTiCtbo6YT/VfGKbgIrHcGwPC6nXIKfk+b sjzYFIhxTc/nyJnlDRBDKNZ3pHURYyXbZzMgZjZ3d8K+YmtL1+kjV/Lr+xNkv/08ILrx zoG0Ju+XpWr7Nn4Mvpqm9FkpHgfUWsRWupVNXttLkkLs1Y7SXNaj3a9HH4nrcCXE4a7h 4I8SRYMlIoHCWJjuLfpmtcr0bG2ebGAPVOGQ8IJG7WkJO5vn5wv/TDmrMH/LTE3AsC/5 5efQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=V5lkrTTS; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id oq28si1233443ejb.358.2019.10.30.06.12.35; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 06:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=V5lkrTTS; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726269AbfJ3NJ4 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:09:56 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:52684 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726097AbfJ3NJ4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 09:09:56 -0400 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9UD9hoY093115; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:09:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1572440983; bh=M5l3IXLPZ7PbLcGaD/x5qSLUDpxoQyE8oFPSKxV0M6M=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=V5lkrTTSDHh0l+SiR9NbcKYF4Ssaol8yXGCPibS7s4RTE0cDwNKtEG18APtxtqZGq 2uM4ETLP0V3C6c/DuT/EpHRVSbWe59T17HFe9pfSAQnuWKN5ROk9txWhrS4tvS2V6S opxO1af7+PkGymOiMkSUpF9JVwCn8ESbgvAJHfPM= Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (dlee101.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.31]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9UD9hQN087336 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:09:43 -0500 Received: from DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:09:30 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE110.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:09:43 -0500 Received: from [10.250.98.116] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9UD9eLx111494; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:09:40 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] soc: ti: k3: add navss ringacc driver To: Lokesh Vutla , Peter Ujfalusi , , , , CC: , , , , , , , References: <20191001061704.2399-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20191001061704.2399-3-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> From: Grygorii Strashko Message-ID: <5e65db22-1436-5f2d-6355-9ba3aa5a9d88@ti.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:10:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/10/2019 10:52, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Grygorii, > > [...snip..] > >> + >> +static int k3_ringacc_ring_access_io(struct k3_ring *ring, void *elem, >> + enum k3_ringacc_access_mode access_mode) >> +{ >> + void __iomem *ptr; >> + >> + switch (access_mode) { >> + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_PUSH_HEAD: >> + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_HEAD: >> + ptr = (void __iomem *)&ring->fifos->head_data; >> + break; >> + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_PUSH_TAIL: >> + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_TAIL: >> + ptr = (void __iomem *)&ring->fifos->tail_data; >> + break; >> + default: >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + ptr += k3_ringacc_ring_get_fifo_pos(ring); >> + >> + switch (access_mode) { >> + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_HEAD: >> + case K3_RINGACC_ACCESS_MODE_POP_TAIL: >> + dev_dbg(ring->parent->dev, >> + "memcpy_fromio(x): --> ptr(%p), mode:%d\n", ptr, >> + access_mode); >> + memcpy_fromio(elem, ptr, (4 << ring->elm_size)); > > Does this work for any elem_size < 64 or any element size not aligned with 64? Max value of elem_size is 6 as per TRM. > > IIUC, in message mode, ring element should be inserted in a single burst write > and there is no doorbell facility. If the above conditions are not met, we are > supposed to use proxy. > > In this driver, I don't see any restrictions on the ring element size for > message mode and directly written to io. Am I missing something? > You are right and corresponding check can be added at k3_ringacc_ring_cfg() for the case K3_RINGACC_RING_MODE_MESSAGE and no proxy [..] -- Best regards, grygorii