Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932229AbWAJQRi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:17:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932235AbWAJQRi (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:17:38 -0500 Received: from gromit.trivadis.com ([193.73.126.130]:34108 "EHLO lttit.trivadis.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932229AbWAJQRh (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:17:37 -0500 Message-ID: <43C3DE1F.9010807@cubic.ch> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:17:35 +0100 From: Tim Tassonis User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: State of the Union: Wireless References: <43C3AAE2.1090900@cubic.ch> <20060110125357.GH3911@stusta.de> <43C3B7C8.8000708@cubic.ch> <20060110141324.GJ3911@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20060110141324.GJ3911@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1728 Lines: 40 > > I won't try to speak for Linus (perhaps he'd like to pipe up at some point), > but I think you're pulling that concept wayy out of context here. > > Quoting ManagementStyle: > >> Btw, another way to avoid a decision is to plaintively just whine "can't >> we just do both?" and look pitiful. Trust me, it works. If it's not >> clear which approach is better, they'll eventually figure it out. The >> answer may end up being that both teams get so frustrated by the >> situation that they just give up. > > Built into that paragraph, I think, is the assumption that you never 'do > both'. Well, we'd have to ask Linus about this one. I think it can be a good idea to do both, if you're not sure which one is better. > > Also, referring to OSS/Alsa is just a great way to illustrate the problem with > your idea. There is, today, finally a "dominant" solution, but how long did > it take us to get there? By my count, a really long time! And along the way > we've had to deal with all kinds of applications that just support the first > and not the other. And it seems like far too many people still have just one > foot in the door - take for instance the README files shipped with commercial > game ports that advise using OSS at the first hint of trouble with Alsa. A network device is way better abstracted by the operating system, so compatibility issues are of much smaller concern. > Is this what we want for wireless? We wouldn't get it, see above. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/