Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp1133045ybx; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:20:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqya92A5i5uERlS/upWu8/oBK0UfbmX8iSMD7fm30V8R2nGWvKNqc7rZkVi6e9CVbz4NgaA6 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d615:: with SMTP id c21mr835626edr.167.1572456023572; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:20:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572456023; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kQvn5iyWBHqhJ7/bxVAFRZ6TS2f+vwnOCe2UIp6IJo6P6R17y3+Uwm7n46lh7I59z4 K6iRNLwy2IRsOMcd95m8WhnGTSk3ewNyUkSkWadJ70Dxuo+puSDG7vgsu5GmAjLzVVPk u283X7sCz/eV9AcJRGH21vZw/uRxoPTFWiZEz2qYrLwRhyStEI54ofGmELeRXVGs+zOg icqURmYbi9ZNJp9KIg6+aZdoY8yjbYFkdcRS+G4fwrQmHfrL3lm4ThfD1tT2nJwRZrVg S8bWjtHpRr4+rWb2M3A3oIWxTS6XxizKYAsbuRplhHQGGhpHCuuZwnU7UYyAdIcElZLV RX/Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject :message-id; bh=2yQ+P9cesU7tXX2oJDBahJ434E+YlAIJx+oKEUcM9yM=; b=IeMgdX7s0TVhtB0nqo3+sd1NnOaGNw55pnU30lwl3iT/51eHzGgIQZS0C/DwtxQICr NYGXkFeIw15X9fP6g7kZW4ziksS+WUOn2Cxj7T2b4wVaBz3g3DfKsnCnZFElXWQwr+6X 8v4amoa+F1st+JtymrE2sRKPq4h1uwN0Z0Y+8C1ytX80OceK/lcXNb98Jdmp5FuiQ7h4 ZG3fUgXZbZ9j7lN800HVDKdkWXgUmw6hOoMwNiKWksKbq1CZErcxe6K5c4i1dSSzXPNp KGUB+uHnzHEXsh5UAfeDEbBMHa6wR5YV6SzWp/381F59jPBWpIa+es4DfgbkOeQY4EYG Yg/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v20si1755936ejq.300.2019.10.30.10.19.58; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727232AbfJ3RSz (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:18:55 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0177.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.177]:58027 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726602AbfJ3RSz (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Oct 2019 13:18:55 -0400 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B056A181D3417; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:18:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:599:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:4321:5007:9012:10004:10226:10400:11232:11658:11914:12109:12297:12740:12760:12895:13069:13255:13311:13357:13439:14659:21080:21433:21627:21740:30054:30060:30090:30091,0,RBL:47.151.135.224:@perches.com:.lbl8.mailshell.net-62.8.0.100 64.201.201.201,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:neutral,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:25,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: books65_87a83c243a247 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2019 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.135.224]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf20.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-kselftest/test v6] lib/list-test: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list From: Joe Perches To: Brendan Higgins , shuah Cc: Dan Carpenter , David Gow , Andrew Morton , Kees Cook , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , KUnit Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 10:18:44 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20191024224631.118656-1-davidgow@google.com> <0cb1d948-0da3-eb0f-c58f-ae3a785dd0dd@kernel.org> <20191030104217.GA18421@kadam> <42a8270d-ed6f-d29f-5e71-7b76a074b63e@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.1-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 09:35 -0700, Brendan Higgins wrote: > Agreed. I can see the point of not wanting to write an exception into > checkpatch for every exception of it's general rules; however, it > would be nice if there was a way to maybe have a special comment or > something that could turn off a checkpatch error. That way, a > checkpatch error/warning always means some action should be taken, and > if a rule is being ignored, there is always documentation as to why. That couldn't work when a comment which may exist in a file is out of scope of the patch context.