Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:40:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:40:26 -0400 Received: from age.cs.columbia.edu ([128.59.22.100]:36612 "EHLO age.cs.columbia.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:40:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 09:40:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Ion Badulescu X-X-Sender: To: Robbert Kouprie cc: , Subject: Re: eepro100.c bug on 10Mbit half duplex (kernels 2.4.5 / 2.4.10 / 2.4.11pre6 / 2.4.11 / 2.4.10ac11) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Robbert Kouprie wrote: > Mine says rev 9 :) > > radium:/# lspci -v -d 8086:1229 > 00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] > (rev 09) > Subsystem: Intel Corporation: Unknown device 0011 > Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 17 > Memory at da020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] > I/O ports at c800 [size=64] > Memory at da000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] > Expansion ROM at [disabled] [size=1M] > Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2 That's an 82559ER step A. > > eth0: OEM i82557/i82558 10/100 Ethernet, DE:AD:BA:BE:CA:FE, IRQ 10. > > Receiver lock-up bug exists -- enabling work-around. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > My card DOES NOT have the receiver lock-up bug Your card's eeprom claims otherwise. The eeprom is most likely wrong, but again, the workaround for *this* bug is pretty harmless, whether the bug exists or not. Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/