Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 30 Oct 2019 14:06:58 -0400
From:   Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        syzbot+13f93c99c06988391efe@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: memcontrol: remove
 mem_cgroup_select_victim_node()
Message-ID: <20191030180658.GA46103@cmpxchg.org>
References: <20191029234753.224143-1-shakeelb@google.com>
 <20191030174455.GA45135@cmpxchg.org>
 <20191030175302.GM31513@dhcp22.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191030175302.GM31513@dhcp22.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 06:53:02PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 30-10-19 13:44:55, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > Also, I think we should use sc.gfp_mask & ~__GFP_THISNODE, so that
> > allocations with a physical node preference still do node-agnostic
> > reclaim for the purpose of cgroup accounting.
> 
> Do not we exclude that by GFP_RECLAIM_MASK already?

My bad, you're right. Scratch that, then. Thanks.