Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751170AbWAJSud (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:50:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751174AbWAJSud (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:50:33 -0500 Received: from perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.31]:49592 "EHLO perpugilliam.csclub.uwaterloo.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751170AbWAJSuc (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:50:32 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:50:30 -0500 To: "Jeff V. Merkey" Cc: Bernd Eckenfels , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 2G memory split Message-ID: <20060110185030.GB26581@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> References: <43C3E142.1080206@wolfmountaingroup.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C3E142.1080206@wolfmountaingroup.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 710 Lines: 17 On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:30:58AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > > Here are the patches I use for the splitting. They work well. The > methods employed in Red Hat ES are far better and I am surprised > no one has simply integrated those patches into the kernel which are 4GB > / 4GB kernel/user. I was under the impression the 4G/4G split had some non negligable performance penalties compared to the other options. Len Sorensen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/