Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:20:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:20:48 -0400 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:49933 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:20:41 -0400 Subject: Re: kapm-idled Funny in 2.4.10-ac12? To: kentborg@borg.org (Kent Borg) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 15:21:57 +0100 (BST) Cc: laughing@shared-source.org (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011012101242.C19336@borg.org> from "Kent Borg" at Oct 12, 2001 10:12:42 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > extra CPU cycles (in 2.4.10-ac1) I now notice that xosview is showing > CPU usage when things are quiet as hopping up and down, and top is > reporting kapm-idled CPU usage as in the mid to high 50 percent range. > > Under 2.4.10-ac1 top used to put kapm-idled in the very high 90 > percent range. > > Does this mean my laptop will get less battery life? Is your laptop logging messages in the process ? (dmesg) One thing I changed in -ac was to do sane things when the apm idle request comes back with "no" from the BIOS Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/