Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:48:37 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
To:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
Cc:     mark.rutland@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, wens@csie.org,
        jernej.skrabec@siol.net, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM64: dts: sun50i-h6-pine-h64: state that the DT
 supports the modelB
Message-ID: <20191031094837.wy4gj6xo4youao75@hendrix>
References: <1572438255-26107-1-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com>
 <1572438255-26107-2-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1572438255-26107-2-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:24:13PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> The current sun50i-h6-pine-h64 DT does not specify which model (A or B)
> it supports.
> When this file was created, only modelA was existing, but now both model
> exists and with the time, this DT drifted to support the model B since it is
> the most common one.
> Furtheremore, some part of the model A does not work with it like ethernet and
> HDMI connector (as confirmed by Jernej on IRC).
>
> So it is time to settle the issue, and the easiest way is to state that
> this DT is for model B.

No, this DT was introduced for model A, and we have to keep that. If
some model B changes crept in, that's unfortunate, but it should be
reverted, instead of changing the assumptions like this.

Maxime