Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:28:20 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Bernd Eckenfels <be-mail2006@lina.inka.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2G memory split
Message-ID: <20060110202819.GJ3389@suse.de>
References: <43C3E9C2.1000309@rtr.ca> <E1EwNc8-00063F-00@calista.inka.de> <20060110194200.GD3389@suse.de> <20060110201747.GA26433@lina.inka.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060110201747.GA26433@lina.inka.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 892
Lines: 21

On Tue, Jan 10 2006, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:42:00PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hmm I thought it was obvious with the description in paranthesis after
> > the option. Basically the option is just an optimized default for 1GB of
> > RAM, like the 2G option is tailored for 2GB of low mem on a 2GB machine.
> 
> The description was (for full 1Gb Low Memory) and not (optimized for 1GB
> physical RAM) which would be more obvious, yes. However the text could still
> explain the consequences.

To me the former is clearer, it tells you that you have one full gig of
low memory. But maybe that's just me.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/