Received: by 2002:a25:31c3:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x186csp1397476ybx; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:00:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0K/Jjen1Ve7csV2vZ/B9V2tAQgpb6fAVwJi90iM2GFiduOvqAsDsZIPQrOrbWjANgpard X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f1c5:: with SMTP id gx5mr4972495ejb.314.1572541247640; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:00:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572541247; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BglLnzN9ng4YjNQmquS2miq5JoewYboTg0muVU/iYFSd2+4z8Ghx30noqINsiTcn+K dhQJrKssx0JVhH5NFBPsTy4RNShLkVZTxZ7X16ptVZ0eT3OP4Rj9WO4pW1xe18YrgsyF Fqv1F0teE4R26TLP4Y1RLasznaIU++AQTax7rIKz6kjNQzG2WKu31DmbbN9Kd4gk+K+P BUEq2306KpfGikrVr9aAj+4rE/TrmruoPl8EWDWWx6guFV3naYB3yhfmwcAQLX8cC4W1 2mvFMu26X5G9/rE7RMLajPtT+EAM0cbQmvWJNesLPRI7JwFhPLRbqdJ23vIOdcjezLkH 1JJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=IZBmL1ZODx8kr+8ERdTG6YKEf++6lftFttfbqjYNHTA=; b=a5ZS0ILBg2aqvJC2Wb6r8aOHjEHNc0UoFlZikmbwANh+4oJ/+yKVh40OlCjBvSvbVx XgZaC7nUU0TzPrfMzN2+Yw+CSAMBsqclPAol0ZzAFb1ag9IqaqpOeLtlBmYq9BXGy/sj P9ujzhRFY0HXrQmsdORml7urxCRhfjw7LzSxhzt+zn0BMhCrX7cb98nCWvCM8qqi2mGa rAyzdzeCdetT58Y0qd7ZgRdgBZhtV32zx0xJA4lOaEoLaMhqr0L97Io0uTWTQF8lNW+V DUZQ3SRcvZlxxOB1afmi9XjZOGDG4ByjP8ZXyBuK3ind0bBTA6K3fLl4p1t11KLCL0VK p/WA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n5si3803037ejb.67.2019.10.31.10.00.24; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 10:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728733AbfJaQ5B (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:57:01 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:52308 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728685AbfJaQ5B (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:57:01 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F3A1FB; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [10.1.195.37]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D0743F6C4; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 09:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 16:56:57 +0000 From: Qais Yousef To: Thara Gopinath Cc: Peter Zijlstra , mingo@redhat.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, edubezval@gmail.com, qperret@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, javi.merino@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Subject: Re: [Patch v4 4/6] sched/fair: update cpu_capcity to reflect thermal pressure Message-ID: <20191031165656.oad63hug4t7nlopl@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1571776465-29763-1-git-send-email-thara.gopinath@linaro.org> <1571776465-29763-5-git-send-email-thara.gopinath@linaro.org> <20191023122252.dz7obopab6iizy4s@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20191028153010.GE4097@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20191031105342.b3sl5xhysldfla3g@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <5DBB05BC.40502@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5DBB05BC.40502@linaro.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/31/19 12:03, Thara Gopinath wrote: > On 10/31/2019 06:53 AM, Qais Yousef wrote: > > On 10/28/19 16:30, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 01:28:40PM +0100, Qais Yousef wrote: > >>> On 10/22/19 16:34, Thara Gopinath wrote: > >>>> cpu_capacity relflects the maximum available capacity of a cpu. Thermal > >>>> pressure on a cpu means this maximum available capacity is reduced. This > >>>> patch reduces the average thermal pressure for a cpu from its maximum > >>>> available capacity so that cpu_capacity reflects the actual > >>>> available capacity. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath > >>>> --- > >>>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 1 + > >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > >>>> index 4f9c2cb..be3e802 100644 > >>>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > >>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > >>>> @@ -7727,6 +7727,7 @@ static unsigned long scale_rt_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu) > >>>> > >>>> used = READ_ONCE(rq->avg_rt.util_avg); > >>>> used += READ_ONCE(rq->avg_dl.util_avg); > >>>> + used += READ_ONCE(rq->avg_thermal.load_avg); > >>> > >>> Maybe a naive question - but can we add util_avg with load_avg without > >>> a conversion? I thought the 2 signals have different properties. > >> > >> Changelog of patch #1 explains, it's in that dense blob of text. > >> > >> But yes, you're quite right that that wants a comment here. > > > > Thanks for the pointer! A comment would be nice indeed. > > > > To make sure I got this correctly - it's because avg_thermal.load_avg > > represents delta_capacity which is already a 'converted' form of load. So this > > makes avg_thermal.load_avg a util_avg really. Correct? > Hello Quais, > > Sorry for not replying to your earlier email. Thanks for the review. > So if you look at the code, util_sum in calculated as a binary signal > converted into capacity. Check out the the below snippet from accumulate_sum > > if (load) > sa->load_sum += load * contrib; > if (runnable) > sa->runnable_load_sum += runnable * contrib; > if (running) > sa->util_sum += contrib << SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; > > So the actual delta for the thermal pressure will never be considered > if util_avg is used. > > I will update this patch with relevant comment. Okay thanks for the explanation. -- Qais Yousef