Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932332AbWAJU4B (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:56:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932628AbWAJU4B (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:56:01 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:31394 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932332AbWAJU4A (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:56:00 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Jeffrey Hundstad Subject: Re: 64-bit vs 32-bit userspace/kernel benchmark? Was: Athlon 64 X2 cpuinfo oddities Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:55:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: Jesper Juhl , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <9a8748490601091218m1ff0607h79207cfafe630864@mail.gmail.com> <9a8748490601100129h2ce343f5kc9bc22885f01831a@mail.gmail.com> <43C417A5.6070104@mnsu.edu> In-Reply-To: <43C417A5.6070104@mnsu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601102155.51218.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 623 Lines: 16 > Has anyone done any actual benchmark tests that show 64-bit vs 32-bit > environments/distributions with Athlon64 processors. If so, I love to > see the results. I too elected to stick with 32-bit, using the same > reasoning/guessing above. This discussion is totally off topic on this mailing list. Please stop it right now. And if not please take me out of cc. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/